September 2022 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2129619] Certain vowel symbols overlap with adjacent letter when displaying Sinhala on Fedora 37

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129619 --- Comment #23 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Mike FABIAN from comment #21) > sinhala-test-file.txt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1914858 > is the test file used in the video > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1914859 > > In the video, I install the fedora 36 rpms: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/google-noto-fonts/20201206/9. > fc36/noarch/google-noto-sans-sinhala-fonts-20201206-9.fc36.noarch.rpm > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/google-noto-fonts/20201206/9. > fc36/noarch/google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf-fonts-20201206-9.fc36.noarch.rpm > > > sudo rpm -Uhv google-noto-sans-sinhala-fonts-20201206-9.fc36.noarch.rpm > google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf-fonts-20201206-9.fc36.noarch.rpm --nodeps --force > > And this fixes the overlapping in gedit. Does this issue happen on both vf and non-vf fonts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129619

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2129619] Certain vowel symbols overlap with adjacent letter when displaying Sinhala on Fedora 37

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129619 --- Comment #22 from Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Lohan G from comment #17) > Overlapping is the primary issue I wanted to report. What should I do about > it? Should I file a different report or can someone add the relevant > component to rendering and update this issue? As your primary issue seems to be a font problem, have moved the bug from ibus-m17n to google-noto-fonts. I have also changed the Summary: accordingly and removed ibus and LXDE (does not have anything to do with ibus and not with LXDE either) If there are remaining problems with typing for you please open specific bugs for the typing problems. (We know already that ibus input into gnome-text-editor is very broken ..., but if there are other problems when typing Sinhala please report new bugs for these) You might want to try si-wijesekara not only with ibus-m17n, you can also use si-wijesekara with ibus-typing-booster, that is the better choice in my opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129619

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2129619] Certain vowel symbols overlap with adjacent letter when displaying Sinhala on Fedora 37

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2129619] Certain vowel symbols overlap with adjacent letter when typing Sinhala with ibus on Fedora 37 LXDE spin and Workstation (GNOME)

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129619 Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|pnemade(a)redhat.com |tagoh(a)redhat.com CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org, | |petersen(a)redhat.com, | |psatpute(a)redhat.com, | |pwu(a)redhat.com Component|ibus-m17n |google-noto-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129619

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 --- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> --- Sorry I missed this. How did you run it? That seems working fine if I do fedora-review -b 1822847. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2128605] New: fonttools-4.37.3 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128605 Bug ID: 2128605 Summary: fonttools-4.37.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 4.37.3 Upstream release that is considered latest: 4.37.3 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.37.2-1.fc38 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fonttools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128605

1 year, 7 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2126575] New: google-noto-fonts-common-20201206-10.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126575 Bug ID: 2126575 Summary: google-noto-fonts-common-20201206-10.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository Product: Fedora Version: 36 Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: remyabel(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora When testing an upgrade to detect broken packages by running: sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/d ev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync I get the following error: Problem: package google-noto-sans-phoenician-vf-fonts-20201206-10.fc36.noarch requires google-noto-fonts-common = 20201206-10.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - google-noto-fonts-common-20201206-10.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package google-noto-sans-phoenician-vf-fonts-20201206-10.fc36.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126575

1 year, 7 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2127330] New: fonttools-4.37.2 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127330 Bug ID: 2127330 Summary: fonttools-4.37.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 4.37.2 Upstream release that is considered latest: 4.37.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.37.1-1.fc38 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fonttools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127330

1 year, 7 months

1
4
0 / 0

Returned mail: see transcript for details

by Mail Delivery Subsystem

The original message was received at Thu, 15 Sep 2022 23:45:41 +0900 from [114.218.244.74] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <sales01(a)myfmc.or.kr> (reason: 550 <sales01(a)myfmc.or.kr> No such user here (connected from myfmc.or.kr)) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to [192.168.10.30]: >>> RCPT To:<sales01(a)myfmc.or.kr> <<< 550 <sales01(a)myfmc.or.kr> No such user here (connected from myfmc.or.kr) 550 5.1.1 <sales01(a)myfmc.or.kr>... User unknown >>> DATA <<< 503 Bad sequence of commands

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2120194] Please branch and build vlgothic-fonts in epel9

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120194 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(rituagar(a)in.ibm.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Ritu, can you explain what is the particular requirement/reason to use this older vlgothic for RHEL9? (rather than the default Noto Sans CJK font in RHEL9) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120194

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs September 2022