December 2023 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2255170] New: fonttools-4.47.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255170 Bug ID: 2255170 Summary: fonttools-4.47.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 4.47.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 4.47.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.46.0-1.fc40 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fonttools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255170 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

4 months, 3 weeks

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2251384] New: Wrong Arabic font prioritization in several apps. (Droid kufi prioritized over noto-sans)

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251384 Bug ID: 2251384 Summary: Wrong Arabic font prioritization in several apps. (Droid kufi prioritized over noto-sans) Product: Fedora Version: 39 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Severity: low Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: alawamiaz(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Few fedora releases ago, Noto-Sans-Arabic was set to be the default. It was working fine and Arabic text was displayed in all web browsers using this font. sometime in last few months, every web browser in fedora suddenly started prioritizing "Druid Kufi" font over noto-sans-arabic. which now looks makes arabic text looks jarring. Interestingly, when running from live usb image, noto-sans-arabic is correctly priotirized and being used to render all arabic web pages, but only for FEW MINUTES and then suddenly it's switched to druid kufi!, without updating anything, just running Firefox for few minutes. It's also reproducible after fresh install, the first 3 minutes of using the new fedora installation, Firefox and other browsers are displaying noto-sans then suddenly switch to druid kufi. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 38-39 How reproducible: Consistently Steps to Reproduce: 1.Connect to internet 2.Open arabic webpage in firefox (ex, wikipedia) 3.text would be displayed with druid kufi instead of the default noto-sans-arabic which was chosen to be the default sometime around fedora 36. Actual results: Arabic Text displayed with druid kufi font Expected results: Arabic text should be displayed using noto-sans-arabic as was the case before. Additional info: The font in gnome and top bars is still correctly displayed using noto-sans-arabic. It's browsers that exhibit the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251384 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

4 months, 3 weeks

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 2254164] New: please remove bitmap-fonts-compat metapkg

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254164 Bug ID: 2254164 Summary: please remove bitmap-fonts-compat metapkg Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: bitmap-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora It should not be needed: nothing in Fedora seems to depend on it either. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254164 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

4 months, 4 weeks

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2249989] New: dejavu-sans-mono-fonts is wrong release

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249989 Bug ID: 2249989 Summary: dejavu-sans-mono-fonts is wrong release Product: Fedora Version: 39 Status: NEW Component: Fonts Assignee: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: ToddAndMargo(a)zoho.com QA Contact: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Fedora 39 dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-0:2.37-20.fc38.noarch (note the "38") Would you please update dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-0:2.37-20.fc38.noarch to fc39? # dnf whatprovides dejavu-sans-mono-fonts --releasever=39 Last metadata expiration check: 2:46:25 ago on Wed 15 Nov 2023 11:45:16 PM PST. dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-2.37-20.fc38.noarch : DejaVu Sans Mono, a mono-space sans-serif font family Repo : @System Matched from: Provide : dejavu-sans-mono-fonts = 2.37-20.fc38 dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-2.37-20.fc38.noarch : DejaVu Sans Mono, a mono-space sans-serif font family Repo : fedora Matched from: Provide : dejavu-sans-mono-fonts = 2.37-20.fc38 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249989 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

4 months, 4 weeks

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 2253923] [abrt] setroubleshoot: _FcObjectLookupOtherTypeByName(): python3.12 killed by SIGABRT

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253923 Petr Lautrbach <plautrba(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|setroubleshoot |fontconfig CC| |ajax(a)redhat.com, | |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org, | |gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproje | |ct.org, | |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje | |ct.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, | |rstrode(a)redhat.com, | |tagoh(a)redhat.com Assignee|plautrba(a)redhat.com |tagoh(a)redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #13 from Petr Lautrbach <plautrba(a)redhat.com> --- According to the backtrace it seems to be something deep in the fontconfig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253923 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2186953] New: Irrelevant fonts in the English install (KDE spin)

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186953 Bug ID: 2186953 Summary: Irrelevant fonts in the English install (KDE spin) Product: Fedora Version: 37 Status: NEW Component: Fonts Severity: medium Assignee: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: ddascalescu(a)gmail.com QA Contact: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1957563 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1957563&action=edit Unnecessary fonts I've just installed the KDE spin with the US English settings, and see tens of completely irrelevant fonts for characters sets I have no use form (cuneiform even). I know I can remove these manually, but it would be nice to not have them installed to begin with. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186953

5 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 2252587] New: fontawesome-fonts-6.5.1 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252587 Bug ID: 2252587 Summary: fontawesome-fonts-6.5.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontawesome-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pvoborni(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, loganjerry(a)gmail.com, mrunge(a)redhat.com, pvoborni(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 6.5.1 Upstream release that is considered latest: 6.5.1 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.5.0-1.fc40 URL: http://fontawesome.io Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/826/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontawesome-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252587 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

5 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 2252300] New: fontawesome-fonts-6.5.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252300 Bug ID: 2252300 Summary: fontawesome-fonts-6.5.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontawesome-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pvoborni(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, loganjerry(a)gmail.com, mrunge(a)redhat.com, pvoborni(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 6.5.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 6.5.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.4.2-1.fc39 URL: http://fontawesome.io Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/826/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontawesome-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252300 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

5 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2147531] dependencies on -devel x86_64 and i686 packages are mishandled

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2147531 Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed| |2023-12-06 11:31:08 --- Comment #11 from Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> --- Fedora Linux 37 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on None. Fedora Linux 37 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora Linux please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see the version field. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an active release. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2147531 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2096153] New: strange font priorities in Firefox

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096153 Bug ID: 2096153 Summary: strange font priorities in Firefox Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: google-droid-fonts Assignee: ali.erdinc.koroglu(a)intel.com Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ali.erdinc.koroglu(a)intel.com, contact(a)dannycolin.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, oliver(a)redhat.com, skyfaller(a)gmail.com Depends On: 2062386 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Cloning to focus on the Droid specific issue here. please ignore URW related description. +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2062386 +++ Description of problem: Sometimes, when using a native font stack in CSS on a web page, fonts that are not in the font stack at all are substituted for the desired fonts. This only seems to affect web pages viewed using: - Fedora (not Ubuntu, Debian 11, or Manjaro) - Firefox (not Chrome or Chromium) - When using the RPM version or Mozilla's official build from their website (not the Flatpak) Happens in the stable version of Firefox, Firefox Beta, and Firefox nightly. Two substitutions I've identified so far: - Droid Sans is substituted for Open Sans - P052 is substituted for 'URW Palladio L' or Palatino Substituting for Palatino may be less objectionable, since that's a generic choice, but URW Palladio L is rather specific and it's surprising to see the substitution. This also wouldn't be as objectionable if the font substitutions were better. Droid Sans doesn't look much like Open Sans at all, and P052 looks really ugly (it has unevenly sized letters). In Firefox Flatpak, it instead substitutes the better-looking 'TeX Gyre Pagella', and only does that for Palatino, not for 'URW Palladio L' (which was higher priority in my font stack). This is more desirable behavior. The source of the problem seems to be that if you run the following command: fc-match :family="Open Sans" It returns Droid Sans. Possibly related bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1406790 How reproducible: Consistently Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open a clean Fedora 35 install, and verify that Open Sans is not installed. 2. Create the following web page and view it in a browser: ``` <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title></title> <style> h1,h2,h3,h4 { font-family: Open Sans, Fira Sans; } </style> </head> <body> <h1>Hello World</h1> <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.</p> </body> </html> ``` Alternately, view a real live (but more complex) website at https://www.maximumethics.dev/ Actual results: Notice that the text on the webpage is displayed in Droid Sans, not Open Sans. Expected results: The webpage displays the next available font in the font stack, Fira Sans in this case, or the browser's default font if you don't have Fira Sans. --- Additional comment from Akira TAGOH on 2022-03-30 09:26:08 UTC --- Well, maybe good to file a separate bug to object each substitutions. For Open Sans, google-droid-sans-fonts has the following config: <alias binding="same"> <family>Open Sans</family> <accept> <family>Droid Sans</family> </accept> </alias> This is the reason why you see that behavior. For URW Palladio L, urw-base35-fonts-common has the following config: <alias binding="same"> <family>URW Palladio L</family> <accept> <family>P052</family> </accept> </alias> And finally for Palatino, it is in urw-base35-p052-fonts: <alias binding="same"> <family>Palatino</family> <accept> <family>P052</family> </accept> </alias> Although those urw config are coming from upstream. so if you have any objections for them, it would be good to talk with URW upstream. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062386 [Bug 2062386] strange font priorities in Firefox -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096153

5 months, 1 week

1
6
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs December 2023