December 2009 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376 --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2009-12-20 07:25:43 EDT --- * Created patch to remove verification modules in build that use wrapper scripts that require, and invoke third party non-free binaries. * Remove Scripts/ folder. * Wrote README.fedora and removed default README. Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-chalmers-lava2000.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-1.f... Successful Koji builds for F-11, F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1881728 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1881732 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Arun SAG <sagarun(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #37 from Arun SAG <sagarun(a)gmail.com> 2009-12-19 13:35:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-haskell-mode Short Description: Haskell editing mode for Emacs Owners: sagarun chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |chitlesh(a)gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #36 from Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh(a)gmail.com> 2009-12-19 13:24:22 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package emacs-%{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i686. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. Emacs-haskell-mode does not have any. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths. Emacs-haskell-mode does not have any. - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files. Emacs-spice-mode does not have any. - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: mock builds successfully in i686. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 547997] New: rpmbuild -bs became more strict and chokes on undefined macros in Requires

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: rpmbuild -bs became more strict and chokes on undefined macros in Requires https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547997 Summary: rpmbuild -bs became more strict and chokes on undefined macros in Requires Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: rpm AssignedTo: pmatilai(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pmatilai(a)redhat.com, jnovy(a)redhat.com, ffesti(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: I can understand on BuildRequires but rpm now seems to need to be able to expand macros in Requires to build srpms? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.8.0-0.beta1.3 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. use macro like %ghc_version not defined in rpm or redhat-rpm-config (base) in package .spec file 2. try to build in dist-f13 in koji 3. job fails while generating srpm Actual results: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1874770 Expected results: Be allowed like in dist-f12? Additional info: We need ghc macros in rpm or redhat-rpm-config like we have for ocaml. See ghc-rpm-macros package for %ghc_version and more. Without fixing this we can't build ghc library packages for rawhide and ghc-6.12.1 was just released so we need to rebuild them all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 4 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|chitlesh(a)gmail.com | Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] Need adding to the list

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

Oops missed this too. ----- "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos(a)serpentine.com> wrote: > Could whoever owns the list please whitelist bos(a)fedoraproject.org ? I get bounces every time I do something in CVS. It is a "known" problem (to me anyway) and I got so used to... (It is caused by the haskell-sig on packages in Package DB we should ask fedora infrastructure what to do about it though now is probably not the best time...) I talked to the infrastructure guys and it should be better now but cvs commits are not reaching the list yet so it needs to be tweaked a bit more. Jens

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] RFE: GHC packaging improvement proposal

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

Hi Lorenzo, and welcome to the SIG! :) Just noticed your mail. > I am a newcomer to Haskell (thanks to xmonad) and I plan to do some > serious things with it (as soon as I get proficient with this elegant FP > language). Great (BTW I just pushed xmonad-0.9 into f12-testing - should appear soon.) > During the last two-three weeks I've been secretly working on the GHC > package (6.12). As you know, GHC can now create shared libraries so I deemed > that a little change in the .spec file was necessary. Okay cool - better not to work in secret though :) - I think the current ghc.spec in pkg cvs already supports shared libs quite a bit now but look forward to looking at your ideas. :) > * ghc: contains only the compiler, tools (such as ghc-pkg, etc) and > libHSrts.a which seems to be (statically) linked in every application. > In general: stuff needed only at compile time. Yeah but I have seen ghc package install errors when static libs are not around - probably something that upstream needs to fix. > * ghc-libs (and ghc-libs-static): contains the dynamic version of > libHSghc > which is *HUGE* (and I guess it's needed only by programs which want > to access > GHC internals -- I don't have it installed and xmonad, xmobar and such > things work). Cool - guess we could have done that long ago... > * ghc-common: This subpackage contains packages.d/*.config files and > owns core library directories, it is (mostly) empty and is required by > ghc-runtime and ghc-runtime-static. > * ghc-runtime (and ghc-runtime-static): nothing to say, it contains > just the core libraries and their interface files (.hi/.dyn_hi) I think shared libs and interfaces should be separated. > + cabal-install 0.7.5 (from darcs) seems to work decently with this That's right. > + I decided to take libHSghc off the runtime package(s) because of > its huge size and because it is not generally needed by other > libraries/applications, thus making the runtime package small: Aha good idea. > I still can't get Cabal to link shared libraries instead of static Pass the option "--ghc-option=-dynamic" to cabal configure. > http://gitorious.org/lvillani/specs/blobs/master/haskell/ghc/ghc.spec > + I'm 101% sure that there are errors in that .spec file. It is shame you branched off 6.12.0.20091010-2.fc13, Bryan and I committed quite few changes in cvs since then. I know cvs is not a DVCS - fedora pkg cvs may be moving to git next year... :) The current spec file works for rc2 anyway and provides shared libraries. Going to look through your spec file now. In future it would be helpfil if you could send us a patch or put it into bugzilla if you like and I can review and integrate to cvs. And join us on freenode #fedora-haskell if you care for irc. Thanks, Jens

14 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376 Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |chitlesh(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #35 from Arun SAG <sagarun(a)gmail.com> 2009-12-11 22:46:55 EDT --- Hi, Updated the package to make it work with centos. Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.7.0-3.fc12.src... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 541372] ghc-HUnit conflicts with ghc-6.10 (f11-updates-testing)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541372 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|ghc-HUnit conflicts with |ghc-HUnit conflicts with |ghc. |ghc-6.10 | |(f11-updates-testing) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel December 2009