December 2009 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 541372] ghc-HUnit conflicts with ghc.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541372 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED CC| |fedora-haskell-list@redhat. | |com Platform|i586 |All AssignedTo|bos(a)serpentine.com |petersen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-12-11 02:32:42 EDT --- ghc-HUnit should not have been pushed to f11. It will be needed for ghc 6.12 in Fedora 13. I untagged it in koji from f11 updates-testing so hoefully it will go away. Maybe I was too quick to kill the bodhi ticket before the package could get pulled from the repos? :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] ghc-HUnit not present in F-12?

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

(We should really make a separate bugs list or I should start filtering the bugzilla mails...;) ----- "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos(a)serpentine.com> wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541372 See the review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 where I already asked why we were adding the package: it is only needed for ghc-6.12. > I tried to see if I could reproduce it on F-12, which I'm now running, > but in fact ghc-HUnit isn't available at all for F-12. I've no idea why Because I blocked for exactly the above reasonble. ;) > , or what to do about this. Thanks for asking - I just untagged it from updates-testing in koji - hope that helps otherwise we can ask releng to take it out of the repo if it is still there. But for the reporter he just need to remove it but he probably knows that already. Anyway we should should probably start to prepare reviews for the other packages missing from 6.12. :) Jens

14 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list@redhat. | |com, shakthimaan(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathstuf(a)gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> 2009-12-09 10:36:45 EDT --- Ping. Status update on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] Re: %ghc_pkg_ver

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

[cc'ing fedora-haskell-list as a headsup] > I was wondering whether it's supposed to work on F 11. I was trying > to build xmonad on F 11, and rpm gave me unresolved dependencies, > the rpm had the dependency of "xmonad = %ghc_pkg_ver", literally. Yeah I know it is ugly - we need ghc support in rpm... > I eventually > just dropped versions of these dependencies before compiling the > package, so it works for me now. Ok :) I pushed the new ghc-rpm-macros to updates yesterday - but I should really make the version dependency on it explicit in the packages. Jens

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net --- Comment #34 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net> 2009-12-08 18:50:32 EDT --- I had no problems rebuilding http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.7.0-1.fc12.src... on F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] RFE: GHC packaging improvement proposal

by Lorenzo Villani

An hearty 'hello' to Haskell SIG folks! I am a newcomer to Haskell (thanks to xmonad) and I plan to do some serious things with it (as soon as I get proficient with this elegant FP language). During the last two-three weeks I've been secretly working on the GHC package (6.12). As you know, GHC can now create shared libraries so I deemed that a little change in the .spec file was necessary. ____________________________________ PROPOSED LAYOUT * ghc: contains only the compiler, tools (such as ghc-pkg, etc) and libHSrts.a which seems to be (statically) linked in every application. In general: stuff needed only at compile time. * ghc-libs (and ghc-libs-static): contains the dynamic version of libHSghc which is *HUGE* (and I guess it's needed only by programs which want to access GHC internals -- I don't have it installed and xmonad, xmobar and such things work). * ghc-common: This subpackage contains packages.d/*.config files and owns core library directories, it is (mostly) empty and is required by ghc-runtime and ghc-runtime-static. * ghc-runtime (and ghc-runtime-static): nothing to say, it contains just the core libraries and their interface files (.hi/.dyn_hi) * ghc-prof: contains profiled (static) libraries, including the huge libHSghc. This is the biggest and monolithic package. ___________________________________________ NOTES + cabal-install 0.7.5 (from darcs) seems to work decently with this GHC release. + X11 library has problems with hsc2hs (one file has to be converted to UTF-8 before building the package) + ghc-libs-static and ghc-runtime-static Require ghc (these are useless without a compiler) while ghc-libs and ghc-runtime don't. + I decided to take libHSghc off the runtime package(s) because of its huge size and because it is not generally needed by other libraries/applications, thus making the runtime package small: [lvillani@enterprise x86_64]$ du -h * 24M ghc-6.12.0.20091201-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 56K ghc-common-6.12.0.20091201-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 8.4M ghc-doc-6.12.0.20091201-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 8.8M ghc-libs-6.12.0.20091201-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 8.6M ghc-libs-static-6.12.0.20091201-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 25M ghc-prof-6.12.0.20091201-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 7.6M ghc-runtime-6.12.0.20091201-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 8.0M ghc-runtime-static-6.12.0.20091201-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm ___________________________________________ NOTES I still can't get Cabal to link shared libraries instead of static ones (tried --enable-shared, tried --disable-library-vanilla with no effect). This means that even if Cabal tells the compiler to produce dynamic libraries it doesn't link to them (thus making the whole "dynlib" thing almost useless at this point). I don't know if this is a bug or I am so dumb that I can't tell cabal- install what to do. ___________________________________________ LINKS http://gitorious.org/lvillani/specs/blobs/master/haskell/ghc/ghc.spec + I'm 101% sure that there are errors in that .spec file. I look forward to hear your thoughts! -- Lorenzo Villani

14 years, 5 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #33 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2009-12-05 14:11:11 EDT --- %_emacs_bytecompile *.el is failing on my Fedora 12 laptop with: === OUTPUT === + /usr/bin/emacs -batch --no-init-file --no-site-file -f batch-byte-compile haskell-c.el haskell-cabal.el haskell-decl-scan.el haskell-doc.el haskell-font-lock.el haskell-ghci.el haskell-hugs.el haskell-indent.el haskell-indentation.el haskell-mode.el haskell-simple-indent.el haskell-site-file.el inf-haskell.el In toplevel form: haskell-c.el:28:1:Error: Cannot open load file: haskell-mode Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-cabal.elc In toplevel form: haskell-decl-scan.el:130:1:Error: Cannot open load file: haskell-mode In toplevel form: haskell-doc.el:356:1:Error: Cannot open load file: haskell-mode In toplevel form: haskell-font-lock.el:104:13:Error: Cannot open load file: haskell-mode In haskell-ghci-locate-next-error: haskell-ghci.el:302:32:Warning: `string-to-int' is an obsolete function (as of Emacs 22.1); use `string-to-number' instead. In end of data: haskell-ghci.el:334:1:Warning: the function `comint-mode' might not be defined at runtime. Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-ghci.elc In haskell-hugs-gen-load-file: haskell-hugs.el:283:25:Warning: `string-to-int' is an obsolete function (as of Emacs 22.1); use `string-to-number' instead. Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-hugs.elc Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-indent.elc In haskell-indentation-mode: haskell-indentation.el:100:32:Warning: assignment to free variable `haskell-indent-last-position' In haskell-indentation-indent-line: haskell-indentation.el:264:20:Warning: assignment to free variable `haskell-indent-last-position' haskell-indentation.el:272:20:Warning: reference to free variable `haskell-indent-last-position' Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-indentation.elc In end of data: haskell-mode.el:621:1:Warning: the function `compile-internal' is not known to be defined. Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-mode.elc Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-simple-indent.elc Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-site-file.elc In toplevel form: inf-haskell.el:38:1:Error: Cannot open load file: haskell-mode nilerror: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rSeL06 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rSeL06 (%build) === END === Now, when I try using "emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile *.el", I get the above error. But, using "emacs --batch --eval '(setq load-path (cons "." load-path))' -f batch-byte-compile *.el" builds fine though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #32 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> 2009-12-05 13:37:01 EDT --- Actually, you can use: %_emacs_bytecompile *.el See /etc/rpm/macros.emacs for other available macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #31 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2009-12-05 13:33:10 EDT --- #08 In %build, you can use: emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile *.el I have tested this package, and it works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel December 2009