[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
CC| |petersen(a)redhat.com
Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-31 05:55:59 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
> provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
> upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
> Guidelines for how to deal with this.
> >>> CHECK -> Presuming innocence here re: using the official tarballfor the Platform project.
I didn't understand this comment: the reference src tarball is from hackage.
> MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
> packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed
> should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This
> means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with
> any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you
> feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another
> package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24]
> >>> CHECK
> SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A
> package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
> >>> CHECK
Errm, HUnit is already in ghc....
So do we remove HUnit from ghc or drop this package for now?
Looks like a typo in haskell-platform.cabal to me?
Or am I totally confused?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 9 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] Platform is done
by Yaakov Nemoy
Hey List,
I think i just banged out the last review for the Haskell Platform.
I have a couple of questions about how do we stick to the current
Platform release and still provide the latest and greatest versions of
packages. I also want to know what's next.
Here's some thoughts
- Finish the haskell version of cabal2spec and switch the version in
Fedora over to that.
- Get proper dependency resolution in cabal2spec
- Automate cabal2spec so that it can spit out a fully working package
with little intervention
- Make cabal2spec-diff more intelligent, so that if we apply a patch
provided by it, it won't try to remove the lines we've filled in with
generic macros (lines like license and changelog entries).
- Find a broader set of core packages we want to see, and get those in as well.
- Find CC licensed ascii art for a unicorn, so we can submit the
can-i-have-a-pony package to Fedora
Any other comments?
Cheers,
Yaakov
14 years, 9 months