January 2011 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630292] Review Request: ghc-hamlet - Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630292 Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> 2011-01-15 13:20:52 EST --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-hamlet Short Description: Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-13 F-14 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 652573] Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652573 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.f |ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.f |c13 |c14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 652573] Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652573 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-01-13 18:37:25 EST --- ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 652573] Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652573 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.f | |c13 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2011-01-13 18:36:09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 652573] Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652573 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-01-13 18:36:04 EST --- ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 648100] Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mathstuf(a)gmail.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630261] Review Request: ghc-bytestring-nums - Parse numeric literals from ByteStrings

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630261 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630292] Review Request: ghc-hamlet - Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630292 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630292] Review Request: ghc-hamlet - Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630292 --- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2011-01-09 23:11:24 EST --- [+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i ghc-hamlet-*.rpm ../ghc-hamlet.spec ghc-hamlet.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haml -> Ham, Hal, Hamal The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yesodweb -> mesoderm, yesterday, yessed The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet.i686: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/hamlet-0.6.0/libHShamlet-0.6.0-ghc6.12.1.so The binary declares the stack as executable. Executable stack is usually an error as it is only needed if the code contains GCC trampolines or similar constructs which uses code on the stack. One common source for needlessly executable stack cases are object files built from assembler files which don't define a proper .note.GNU-stack section. ghc-hamlet.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haml -> Ham, Hal, Hamal The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yesodweb -> mesoderm, yesterday, yessed The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet.src: W: strange-permission hamlet-0.6.0.tar.gz 0640L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. ghc-hamlet-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haml -> Ham, Hal, Hamal The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yesodweb -> mesoderm, yesterday, yessed The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet-devel.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-hamlet-doc.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet-doc.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yesodweb -> mesoderm, yesterday, yessed The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-hamlet-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-hamlet-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yesodweb -> mesoderm, yesterday, yessed The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-hamlet-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-hamlet-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/hamlet-0.6.0/libHShamlet-0.6.0_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 18 warnings. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches License - OK, BSD license No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package templatse - OK, provided a patch to upgrade to cabal2spec 0.22.4 Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Buildroot is ignored - present anyway. OK. Patch provided to remove it %clean is ignored - present anyway. OK. Patch provided to remove it Build Requires list - OK Summary and description - OK API documentation - OK, in devel package (from F14 onwards) [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . License is BSD [+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. LICENSE file packaged with base package. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. md5sum ghc-hamlet-0.6.0-1.fc14.src/hamlet-0.6.0.tar.gz 5337d743a270c6e2f1be4cabce42f243 ghc-hamlet-0.6.0-1.fc14.src/hamlet-0.6.0.tar.gz md5sum ~/Downloads/hamlet-0.6.0.tar.gz 5337d743a270c6e2f1be4cabce42f243 ~/Downloads/hamlet-0.6.0.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on i686. [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [NA]MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly using the %find_lang macro [NA]MUST: Packages stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Checked with rpmquery --list [NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Checked with ls -lR [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+]MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA]MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA]MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} rpm -e ghc-hamlet error: Failed dependencies: ghc-hamlet = 0.6.0-1.f13 is needed by (installed) ghc-hamlet-devel-0.6.0-1.f13.i686 rpm -e ghc-hamlet-devel error: Failed dependencies: ghc-hamlet-devel = 0.6.0-1.f13 is needed by (installed) ghc-hamlet-prof-0.6.0-1.f13.i686 [NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. Checked with rpmquery --list and rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Installed the packages. Imported Text.Hamlet module via ghci. Works fine. [+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. cabal2spec-diff is OK. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630292] Review Request: ghc-hamlet - Haml-like template files that are compile-time checked

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630292 Bug 630292 depends on bug 630223, which changed state. Bug 630223 Summary: Review Request: ghc-failure - A simple type class for success/failure computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630223 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2011-01-09 23:11:01 EST --- Created attachment 472496 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=472496 Patch to upgrade to cabal2spec 0.22.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel January 2011