January 2011 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 648100] Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-01-06 03:27:06 EST --- Created attachment 472006 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=472006 ghc-xml.spec-1.patch Small patch to update to cabal2spec-0.22.4 (still in testing). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 648100] Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-01-06 01:51:35 EST --- Sorry "soon" became 2011... :-/ I note that xml-1.3.7/Text/XML/Light/Lexer.hs is missing a (license) header. It would be good to ask to author to add one. Here is the review: +:ok, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output ghc-xml.src: W: strange-permission ghc-xml.spec 0640L ghc-xml.src: W: strange-permission xml-1.3.7.tar.gz 0640L 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ghc-xml-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-xml-devel ghc-xml-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-xml-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/xml-1.3.7/libHSxml-1.3.7_p.a 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. These are ok. [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release fc2d7e1a321b4393dd444b16ab6ba669 xml-1.3.7.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2701815 [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] ghc-7.0.1 libraries subpackaged

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

Hi, Following on from subpackaging the large ghc API library (ghc-ghc) a year ago, I have now succeeded in rawhide to subpackage all the libraries that ship with ghc with changes to ghc and ghc-rpm-macros. So there are now subpackages like ghc-base{,-devel,-prof}, etc. This took rather more hours of my holiday time than I care to admit but I think it should be a win in the long term, and puts ghc's libraries on an equal footing with other our library packages in Fedora space. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2702178 There is also a new ghc-devel meta-package which pulls in all ghc-*-devel from ghc libraries and ghc-prof also becomes a meta-package. ghc-libs is gone. Since our cabal2spec templates pull in ghc-prof, which effectively pulls in ghc-devel, no changes are needed at this point for current packages, but please do report any problems. The ghc base package only requires ghc-base-devel by default. Note that ghc-devel and ghc-prof pull in ghc-ghc now though. I may backport some of these changes later to F14 and perhaps F13. Otherwise we have to wait about a year before we can make corresponding changes to cabal2spec, since I am trying hard now to keep cabal2spec the same across all current releases with ghc-rpm-macros compatibility. Thanks, Jens

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 652573] Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652573 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-01-05 16:19:35 EST --- ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-zip-archive'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] cabal2spec-0.22.3 in testing

by Jens-Ulrik Petersen

Hi, I pushed cabal2spec-0.22.3 to koji for rawhide, f14, and f13. Please use it for package reviews going forward. I will probably commit the corresponding changes to the all rawhide packages later to sync them up to this version. The changes are not that big: - lower ghc-rpm-macros version requirement to 0.7.3 (in f13 testing) - drop bcond for shared and hscolour, and also buildroot cleaning - minor "parsing" tweaks to cabal2spec Let me know if you have find an problems or regressions, or open a bug in bugzilla. (I will be away for the next week btw.) Jens

13 years, 4 months

2
3
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 652573] Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652573 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-01-04 21:15:13 EST --- ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 652573] Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652573 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-01-04 21:15:05 EST --- ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 652573] Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652573 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-01-04 21:14:04 EST --- Packages built for f15, f14 and f13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630223] Review Request: ghc-failure - A simple type class for success/failure computations

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630223 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-neither-0.1.0-1.fc13 |ghc-neither-0.1.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630283] Review Request: ghc-neither - Either with monad and applicative instances

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630283 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-neither-0.1.0-1.fc13 |ghc-neither-0.1.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel January 2011