haskell-devel July 2013

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
413 discussions

[Bug 947819] Review Request: idris - Functional Programming Language with Dependent Types
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947819 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |relrod(a)redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=R1KnfdzcPT&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 978827] Review Request: ghc-system-filepath - File and directory path manipulations
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978827 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |relrod(a)redhat.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |relrod(a)redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> --- This looks good to me. APPROVED. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present. Note: Archive *.a files found in ghc-system-filepath-devel See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries (Ignorable: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Haskell#Static_vs._Dynamic_Linking) ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 378880 bytes in 24 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-system-filepath-0.4.7-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-system-filepath-devel-0.4.7-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint ghc-system-filepath-devel ghc-system-filepath 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- ghc-system-filepath-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh ghc(system-filepath-0.4.7-c7b27b28fefe76644dbb98b4689e1735) ghc-compiler ghc-devel(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc-devel(bytestring-0.10.0.2-4f93248f75667c2c3321a7a6761b576f) ghc-devel(deepseq-1.3.0.1-5cc4cd89bdc2e8f6db1833d95ec36926) ghc-devel(text-0.11.3.1-e38859e86485c167fa7c9441789e7607) ghc-system-filepath(x86-64) ghc-system-filepath (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ghc(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc(bytestring-0.10.0.2-4f93248f75667c2c3321a7a6761b576f) ghc(deepseq-1.3.0.1-5cc4cd89bdc2e8f6db1833d95ec36926) ghc(text-0.11.3.1-e38859e86485c167fa7c9441789e7607) libHSarray-0.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbase-4.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbytestring-0.10.0.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSdeepseq-1.3.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSghc-prim-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSinteger-gmp-0.5.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHStext-0.11.3.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- ghc-system-filepath-devel: ghc-devel(system-filepath-0.4.7-c7b27b28fefe76644dbb98b4689e1735) ghc-system-filepath-devel ghc-system-filepath-devel(x86-64) ghc-system-filepath: ghc(system-filepath-0.4.7-c7b27b28fefe76644dbb98b4689e1735) ghc-system-filepath ghc-system-filepath(x86-64) libHSsystem-filepath-0.4.7-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) Unversioned so-files -------------------- ghc-system-filepath: /usr/lib64/ghc-7.6.3/system-filepath-0.4.7/libHSsystem-filepath-0.4.7-ghc7.6.3.so Source checksums ---------------- http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/system-filepath/0.4.7/system-fi… : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 09d93ad801ed0f9ea166c9e7bfb1d761c056f5019a5f9297f2d3fa6cfeab0b81 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 09d93ad801ed0f9ea166c9e7bfb1d761c056f5019a5f9297f2d3fa6cfeab0b81 Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 978827 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RVAayTxsOv&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 947819] Review Request: idris - Functional Programming Language with Dependent Types
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947819 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard| |Ready -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YSjsFLdZO7&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 947819] Review Request: idris - Functional Programming Language with Dependent Types
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947819 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Okay I moved the devel files from datadir to under libdir that at least address the above rpmlint error. Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/idris/idris.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/idris/idris-0.9.8-2.fc19.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5584283 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8emegRC00l&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 909150] New: ghc-snap-core-0.9.3.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909150 Bug ID: 909150 Summary: ghc-snap-core-0.9.3.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-snap-core Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.9.3.1 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.9.2.2 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/snap-core/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0ihRbXGIrO&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 746557] New: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '13

07 Jul '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagged - Newtype wrappers for phantom types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: Ready Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 648246,737228,742882 Blocks: 648248,713359 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-tagged.spec SRPM http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14.s… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 910639] Review Request: ghc-entropy - A platform independent entropy source
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '13

07 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910639 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-entropy-0.2.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-entropy-0.2.1-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=V8PwclqCX1&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 630275] Review Request: ghc-cereal - A binary serialization library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jul '13

06 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630275 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-cereal-0.3.0.0-1.fc13 |ghc-cereal-0.3.5.2-2.el6 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-cereal-0.3.5.2-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xFqZqcNjFn&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980133] Review Request: ghc-language-java - Java source manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jul '13

06 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980133 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-language-java-0.2.4-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ue2FYg1jvY&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jul '13

06 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- Package ghc-libffi-0.1-2.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ghc-libffi-0.1-2.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12402/ghc-libffi-0.1-2.… then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7L6aJwrM9r&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

← Newer
1
...
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
...
42
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel July 2013