On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 12:18 +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Aditya
Patawari<adimania(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Retry sending these mails. Even if we are able to remove 10 inactive
> ones it will be good for us. Additionally we can ask to put their
> location on fedora map as a compulsory step for continuing as an
> ambassador
Let me put my foot down and say NO.
That was a bad experience, I won't repeat it.
+1
Replying to mails or putting yourself on the map makes no difference
whatsoever . That is no measure of whether a person will work or not.
Ankur, what you suggested is (most part of it) already implemented
with the new membership process. And I am not for making any
assumption for number of active ambassadors. Whoever wants to work,
will do it, if someone does not work will be eventually cleaned up. I
don't think we need to worry about it. Last week, we cleaned up 210
inactive ambassadors.
hi,
That's great. I didn't know a clean up was already ongoing. Is there a
wiki page or something for us to know more?
I'd suggest a quarterly "What I'm doing" report as mandatory for all
ambassadors:
All you've got to do is mail to the list, with relevant info and
links(some way of knowing that you are actually up to something).Also,
the work should be Fedora oriented. Just being part of an LUG isn't
enough for a Fedora ambassador.
comments folks?
@ Rangeen etc?
--
regards,
Ankur