[Bug 818769] Review Request: mingw-orc - Cross compiled Oil Run-time Compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818769
Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-07 06:20:10 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: mingw-orc
Short Description: Cross-compiled Oil Run-time Compiler
Owners: elmarco epienbro rjones kalev
Branches: f17
InitialCC:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years
Re: preparing a mingw-llvm package
by Eric Smith
I think I may have found why I'm not getting any .dll.a and .la files for mingw-llvm.
"the LLVM source code lacks the symbol export directives, [...]
The autoconf build exploits a feature of MinGW's binutils
that auto-exports all symbols, like in Linux."
[from the thread: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/45357 ]
So is it acceptable to package mingw-llvm with the DLLs but without the .dll.a and
.la files? The DLLs work fine with the EXEs in the package.
Thanks,
Eric
12 years