May 2012 - mingw - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-11 05:06:50 EDT --- Full review done: Good: -------- - rpmlint checks return: mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources ^^These are all expected for mingw packages, so no problem here ^^ mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23/COPYING mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23/COPYING mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-debuginfo.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug information for package mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free. mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-debuginfo.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug information for package mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free. ^^ and these can be safely ignored too ^^ - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales properly handled - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Remarks: ------------- - rpmlint checks return: mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-static mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-static Were there ever mingw*-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-static packages in Fedora? If not I suggest removing the 2 Obsoletes. No blockers: APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 --- Comment #4 from Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> 2012-05-11 03:53:48 EDT --- Updated to fix a problem in the llvm-config script, which was attempting to be clever in determining the include and library paths, depending on whether the script was being run from the build directory. In this package it was computing the wrong path, so it has been patched to always simply use the configured PREFIX. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/mingw-llvm/mingw-llvm.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/mingw-llvm/mingw-llvm-3.0-3.fc17.src.rpm Koji scratch build for f17: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4069804 Note that the mingw-llvm-static subpackage is not useful without a static subpackage of libffi. I have modified the spec for mingw-libffi to create the static subpackage and verify that it works. I have sent a patch to Erik van Pienbroek requesting that he add it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 724906] CVE-2011-0216 libxml2: Off-by-one error leading to heap-based buffer overflow in encoding

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724906 Michal Nowak <mnowak(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |820846 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-10 16:38:09 EDT --- mingw-spice-gtk-0.12-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-10 12:35:10 EDT --- mingw-spice-gtk-0.12-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-spice-gtk-0.12-1.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 --- Comment #9 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> 2012-05-10 12:00:31 EDT --- Sorry for wasting your time on that last package. I didn't take time out to run a build. This new package should be good to go. Spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.spec SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalevlember(a)gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-10 11:41:54 EDT --- We removed most of the .la files from mingw packages during the mingw.org -> mingw-w64 toolchain transition in F17. See this post for some background info: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2012-January/004421.html Regarding the guidelines, I am not sure why it's taking so long to get the official pages updated. The draft was approved 3 weeks ago and I've pinged the FPC again this Monday: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/163 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-10 10:56:44 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-10 10:53:34 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-spice-gtk Short Description: Cross-compiled client libraries for SPICE Owners: elmarco epienbro rjones Branches: f17 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw May 2012