On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 13:34 +0200, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
>
There is no need to have own private type for /etc/tayga if it is
read-only.
<<snip>>
Is there a unit file?
With that reasoning there is no need for a private type for service
units either
After all they aren't written to either
The private type for this config file is handy for a (missing)
tyaga_admin() interface. So that tayga administrators can modify the
configuration files, just like a tayga_unit_file_t type fpr service unit
would enable administrators to modify the service unit and manage the
service via the service unit.