On 01/31/2013 01:01 AM, Aman Alam wrote:
ਸੋਮਵਾਰ 28 ਜਨਵਰੀ 2013 07:55 ਸਵੇਰੇ ਨੂੰ, Satyabrata Maitra ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ:
>
> Quality Engineer
> Red Hat Inc.
> PNQ Center, India.
> DID : +91 20 400 57385
> Cell : +91 9860 140303
> Fax : +91 20 660 56040
> ***The wise man should restrain his senses like the crane and
> accomplish his purpose with due knowledge of his place, time and
> ability***
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aman Alam" <apreet.alam(a)gmail.com>
> To: utrrs-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 12:57:29 AM
> Subject: adding more languages...
>
> hi
> our UTRRS [1] project need to expand for more languages, specially we
> can start with few Asian languages (currently UTRRS only supports Indian
> Languages). For start we can add Minimum Unicode code point for those
> languages. Before that we can start review current status and discuss
> about future plans.
>
> if you have any thoughts or ideas, we can start sharing now.
>
> Hi Team
>
> In adding more Asian languages like Chinese, Japanese, Korean means
> first of all, we need to add the codepoints as Aman mentioned,
> according to the Unicode Chart. But these symbolic languages has no
> GSUB or GPOS as such. As I discussed with Aman, we can try to add
> some of the locales which follows Bramhi scripts like Thai,
> Vietnamese or so, as the grammatical rules for these locales more or
> less like Indic locales in his opinion. If so, then we can add the
> codepoints of these locales first and then work on adding GSUB or
> GPOS if exists with research and communicating with the corresponding
> communities.
>
yes, CJK may not required GSUB or GPOS, so south-east-asian Scripts
can be good start
> We have another task for Indic locales pending which is adding 3rd or
> above level of conjuncts (GSUB). We need to discuss and request LMs
> to submit list of 3rd or more levels of conjuncts, in case there are
> any presence of such list in their respective locales and currently
> not present in UTRRS instance.
>
few 3 or 4 combinations are already there, which need to separate out
to make data uniform.
From Indic perspective i think we can target Indian 22 Office language
for this year.
Regards,
Pravin Satpute