On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 06:08:05PM -0400, Ian Weller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 04:36:38PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Just a quest: Why delete rather than archive?
Hmm. I guess they have the same effect on being removed from the default
search.
Anybody against doing this instead? Definitely a lot less harmful for
false positives -- we could probably reduce the warning time to August
1.
We could archive and either put/leave a template on the page, or put
it in a special category, marking it as untouched since conversion and
subject to future removal to keep the archives clean, if they page
proves unworthy of archiving.
- Karsten
--
name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Gardener
team: Red Hat Community Architecture
uri:
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org/wiki
gpg: AD0E0C41