On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:15:43PM +0200, Laszlo BERES wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange írta:
>for this to be ready for Fedora 10. So if you need to use Fedora 10
>as a host, then KVM is your only viable option at this time. If
>you can wait for Fedora 11 (or use RHEL-5 / CentOS-5) then Xen may
>be an option for you. I'll let other people comment on the pros/cons
>of Xen vs KVM outside the kernel availability issue.
Aren't you planning to extend the lifecycle of Fedora 8 as the last
available version with dom0 support?
Extending the Fedora 8 lifecycle would impose an extra support burden
on all Fedora package maintainers that is not really practical. If you
need a long term deployable Xen host, then really you should be looking
at RHEL-5 or CentOS-5 depending on whether you need commercial support
(RHEL) or not (CentOS).
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|