Hi Itamar
No, I haven't tried the x86-64 bit version. When I installed F7 test 4
the installer selected the i386 version of the kernel from the
distribution. So, I assumed that it knew what it was doing and followed
suit when choosing an RPM to use.
Regards,
Langdon
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
are you using fedora 64 bits ?
have you try the x86-64 ?
--------------------
Itamar Reis Peixoto
e-mail: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
msn: itamarjp(a)starmedia.com
skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601
+55 34 3238 3845
+55 11 4063 5033
----- Original Message ----- From: "Langdon Stevenson"
<langdon(a)lindenrow.com.au>
To: <Fedora-xen(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 8:16 PM
Subject: [Fedora-xen] Boot fails with 2.6.20-295.10.fc7
> I have just downloaded and installed the 2.6.20-295.10.fc7.i686.rpm
>
> First question: Is this the correct package for my hardware?
>
> CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo e6600
> Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-965P-DQ6
>
>
> Assuming that it is the right package: When I boot, the xen kernel, it
> gets a lot further than it did with 7, 8, or 9, but it still crashes,
> followed immediately by a reboot.
>
> I haven't worked out if there is a log file of the boot output (any
> pointers there appreciated), but I have taken a photo of the screen
> just before reboot. It includes the following:
>
>
> <snip>
>
> ===============================
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: rc.sysinit/0xc1fcc050/433
> 1 lock held by rc.sysinit/428:
> #0: (&mm-)mmap_sem){....}, at: [(c11f7518)] do_page_fault+0x63a/0xc7h
> [(c1005d3a)] show_trace_log_lvl_0x1a/0x2f
>
> <snip>
>
> ===============================
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
>
>
> I hope that this is useful. If I can provide any more info please let
> me know.
>
> Regards,
> Langdon
>
> --
> Fedora-xen mailing list
> Fedora-xen(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
>