1:52 p.m.
On May 22, 2015 12:00 PM, "Ashutosh Bhakare" <unnatisales123(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
hi All
I have written 2 beats; How to get beat writer badge
Regards
Ashutosh
--
I assign them manually after reviewing wiki history and commit logs. it's
probably time for that, thanks for the reminder.
--Pete
4:04 p.m.
Pete
Are you responsible for the wiki's? I would like to help with reviewing some of them.
Many are not current and do not appear to be maintained.
Regards
Leslie
Mr. Leslie Satenstein
Montréal Québec, Canada
From: Pete Travis <me(a)petetravis.com>
To: For participants of the Documentation Project <docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Regarding Fedora badges for Beat Writing
On May 22, 2015 12:00 PM, "Ashutosh Bhakare" <unnatisales123(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
hi All
I have written 2 beats; How to get beat writer badge
Regards
Ashutosh
--I assign them manually after reviewing wiki history and commit logs. it's probably
time for that, thanks for the reminder.--Pete
--
docs mailing list
docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
9:51 p.m.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:04:18PM +0000, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
Are you responsible for the wiki's? I would like to help with
reviewing some of them. Many are not current and do not appear to be
maintained.
I'll let Pete speak for himself, but, generally, the wiki is uncurated.
Some sections are maintained, others are not really, and the border is
fuzzy.
I think our basic goal is moving _user docs_ away from the wiki
entirely, and keeping it as a contributor workspace only -- good for
drafts, for test matrices, etc -- but anything that users would hit
should be on future new "short, more-polished userdocs site". (Anyone
disagree?)
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
10:05 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
hi
This makes sense to me as well. Having to the point documentation is
always better. I've looked at the current documentation site and it's
pretty accessible. There are some issues, but those aren't site
issues, they're issues in orca itself that are being fixed. One topic
that is probably going to be grought up again and again is the
discussion of patent encumbered codecs. I'm no lawyer, but what is the
legal situation for providing documentation about how to obtain these
codecs, rpm fusion, fluendo, etc? I'd prefer rpmfusion only because
I've used those codecs for years and they're known stable. And they're
free.
I could write something up if interested, but I'll wait until I have a
decision re legal.
Thanks
Kendell clark
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:04:18PM +0000, Leslie S Satenstein
wrote:
> Are you responsible for the wiki's? I would like to help with
> reviewing some of them. Many are not current and do not appear to
> be maintained.
I'll let Pete speak for himself, but, generally, the wiki is
uncurated. Some sections are maintained, others are not really, and
the border is fuzzy.
I think our basic goal is moving _user docs_ away from the wiki
entirely, and keeping it as a contributor workspace only -- good
for drafts, for test matrices, etc -- but anything that users would
hit should be on future new "short, more-polished userdocs site".
(Anyone disagree?)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=pXbM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
10:14 p.m.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:05:39PM -0500, kendell clark wrote:
discussion of patent encumbered codecs. I'm no lawyer, but what
is the
legal situation for providing documentation about how to obtain these
codecs, rpm fusion, fluendo, etc? I'd prefer rpmfusion only because
I've used those codecs for years and they're known stable. And they're
free.
I could write something up if interested, but I'll wait until I have a
decision re legal.
Because I'm not a lawyer either, these questions should probably go to
legal(a)fedoraproject.org.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
1:07 a.m.
On May 22, 2015 9:14 PM, "Matthew Miller" <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:05:39PM -0500, kendell clark wrote:
> discussion of patent encumbered codecs. I'm no lawyer, but what is the
> legal situation for providing documentation about how to obtain these
> codecs, rpm fusion, fluendo, etc? I'd prefer rpmfusion only because
> I've used those codecs for years and they're known stable. And they're
> free.
> I could write something up if interested, but I'll wait until I have a
> decision re legal.
Because I'm not a lawyer either, these questions should probably go to
legal(a)fedoraproject.org.
--
Matthew Miller
We've been asked by legal to remove references to such things and
instructions for setting up repos that provide them in the past. The
working policy is that Fedora Docs content must be about using software
available from Fedora - with reasonable exceptions for using Fedora bits
out of context - AMIs, interoperability with other OSs on the same network,
etc.
I did ask Legal at one point of it was acceptable to cover non-fedora
things - I believe the context at the time was turning off Windows fastboot
- and that sort is good, although a peripheral focus. We definitely don't
want to instruct on breaching any license or ownership restriction.
--Pete
3261
days inactive
3262
days old
6 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Ashutosh Bhakare -
kendell clark -
Leslie S Satenstein -
Matthew Miller -
Pete Travis