12:12 a.m.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ricardo Argüello <ricardo(a)fedoraproject.org>
Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:01 AM
Subject: Re: improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10
To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
Thanks Matthew, this is perhaps one of the most important performance
tweaks for Fedora 11 and beyond.
We need to add this to the Release Notes or something like that!
Should we close the bug now?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:54:52AM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Huh. I actually meant "shouldn't cause failure" there, in terms of it
> still being a valid mount option. The improved relatime code adds that
> heuristic, which avoids the tmpreaper failure. I'm trying to get it
> upstream, at which point I'll backport it - I'm not enthusiastic about
> carrying it around as a custom modification forever.
This got merged for 2.6.30 and I've backported it to the rawhide tree.
It should also turn up in the 2.6.29 kernel update for F10, but possibly
won't be enabled by default there while we work out how to handle the
userland transition.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
12:40 a.m.
David Nalley wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ricardo Argüello <ricardo(a)fedoraproject.org>
Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:01 AM
Subject: Re: improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10
To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
Thanks Matthew, this is perhaps one of the most important performance
tweaks for Fedora 11 and beyond.
We need to add this to the Release Notes or something like that!
I was already following this discussion. Added to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Kernel_Beat
Thanks for forwarding it.
Rahul
12:42 a.m.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram
<sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
David Nalley wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Ricardo Argüello <ricardo(a)fedoraproject.org>
> Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:01 AM
> Subject: Re: improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
>
>
> Thanks Matthew, this is perhaps one of the most important performance
> tweaks for Fedora 11 and beyond.
> We need to add this to the Release Notes or something like that!
I was already following this discussion. Added to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Kernel_Beat
Thanks for forwarding it.
Rahul
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
Outstanding - just wanted to make sure we didn't lose it. Thanks for
picking it up and actually getting the content in.
3:09 a.m.
2009/3/30 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org>
David Nalley wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Ricardo Argüello <ricardo(a)fedoraproject.org>
> Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:01 AM
> Subject: Re: improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora <
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
>
>
> Thanks Matthew, this is perhaps one of the most important performance
> tweaks for Fedora 11 and beyond.
> We need to add this to the Release Notes or something like that!
I was already following this discussion. Added to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Kernel_Beat
pease fix this:
s/This timestamp, called *atime. atime,* can be useful ... /...
Thanks for forwarding it.
Rahul
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
--
Linux counter #213090
5516
days inactive
5516
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
cornel panceac -
David Nalley -
Rahul Sundaram