On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 18:19 -0300, Hugo Cisneiros wrote:

Tommy Reynolds wrote:

...

Uttered "Hugo Cisneiros" (eitch) fedora-docs-commits@redhat.com, spake thus:

...

Modified Files: entities-it.ent entities-it.xml Log Message: added pt_BR translations

I hope the 'pt_BR' log message was a typo for this "it" Italian file!

Dunno what happened, I updated my tree with "cvs up", *only added and changed pt_BR files*, and did a "cvs ci -m 'added pt_BR translations". Looks like I grabbed new -it files from the "cvs up" and commited by accident.

I realized (quaid told me in IRC) how I could commit all files that I modified to the CVS: stripping the filenames in the cvs ci last argument. It was the first time I used this approach :) Is it a bad habit?

My vote is, "Yes." In fact, before I do a commit, I do a "cvs diff <filenames...>" to see what exactly I'm going to be committing. If you leave out the file names, the same rules apply, it will be recursive from your current directory. This is a good way of doing "check yourself before you wreck yourself."

Looks like because of this I will back to specifying the files manually instead of letting cvs decide what's to commit or not...

Sorry ;)

The great thing about CVS is that most harm is undoable, and I doubt this was a big deal. It may partly be obviated by my next post in the entities thread.