Would it make sense to change our docs to refer to
subkeys.pgp.net
instead of MIT?
John
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: GPG Keysigning at FUDCon
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:43:54 -0500
From: Todd Zullinger <tmz(a)pobox.com>
Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora
<fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
To: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
References: <20071212214010.GA20896(a)auslistsprd01.us.dell.com>
<477C3AA7.9010700(a)redhat.com>
<1199353983.13378.1.camel(a)rousalka.dyndns.org> <477D1646.6080207(a)redhat.com>
John Poelstra wrote:
I looked into it more and changed the expiration by:
1) gpg --edit <key> and then option "expire"
2) gpg --keyserver
pgp.mit.edu --send-keys <key> to make change
public
FWIW, you may want to send that to
subkeys.pgp.net, which is where
Matt plans to pull the keys from for the key signing. This is the
default keyserver in recent gnupg releases. I think that there is a
sync between
pgp.mit.edu and
subkeys.pgp.net, but I'm not positive.
The gnupg default is
subkeys.pgp.net because
pgp.mit.edu runs ancient
keyserver software that has many known problems (it ignores photo
packets, can munge up multiple subkeys, and other annoyances).
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL:
www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I do nothing, granted. But I see the hours pass - which is better than
trying to fill them.
-- E. M. Cioran
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list