On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 09:18 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com>,
spake thus:
> On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 08:01 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com>, spake thus:
> > > While I was on and in various planes and hotel rooms in Seattle I
> > > managed to cobble together a couple kibbles 'n' bits in the
docs-common
> > > module that should make our documentation easier to read.
> > Today (Sat Sep 10 08:00:45 CDT 2005) I tried this. The
> > "html-nochunks" doesn't complain, but the plain "html"
target is
> > broken.
> > How can I reproduce just the "warning" you mention?
> Back from vacation... have you tried this recently? I just built a doc
> without problems, other than the expected warning.
Probably not.
Which document are we discussing? I've built all the targets for the
"example-tutorial" and didn't notice any errors or warnings.
Example-tutorial, up until last night, didn't include a <revhistory>
section that would produce the warning. If you update your local copy
and "make html" you should see the warning in question now.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project:
http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/