On 02/27/2015 09:07 AM, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
Quoting Honza Horak (2015-02-26 19:53:51)
> There is a project called 'dock' which is supposed to be something like
> mock for rpms, but for docker :) basically a generic tool to build
> docker images. Why not to set up a github repo there and keep some best
> practices right near the tool? e.g. under:
>
>
https://github.com/dbuildservice/dockerfiles-doc
Little bit more info about dock: it is mainly a plugin system around
docker-build. It can build images inside docker containers (similar thing to
what mock does) and already has a dozen of plugins to operate with sources and
images it builds. Link:
https://github.com/DBuildService/dock
```nitpick
We should change the name of the organization, it's so confusing. Let's make it
fedora-something or redhat-something.
```
Yeah, +1 for finding some better name, I'm just not sure if we should
add fedora/redhat into the name, I was more thinking about some awesome
non-distro upstream-like name..
Honza
>
> Markup format allows us to be productive, not think about text
> formatting much, and github would allow us to deliver more generic
> content with possibility of pull requests, etc...
>
> What do you think?
I agree that github will be great for developing the guidelines! But I think we
should take into account that the docs should be available somewhere on the
internet at some point (separate webpage, wiki...). Therefore we should be
capable of converting the docs from md to html/wiki.
My 2 cents,
Tomas
>
> Honza