On 02/27/2014 03:26 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
On Thu 27 Feb 2014 01:53:06 PM CET Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> On 02/26/2014 06:54 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> The Conflicts and replace comments. I thought it had been decided that
>> conflicts and replacements should not be allowed. If that wasn't
>> a decision we should probably kick those choices back down to the open
>> questions. I've done so now and we can discuss that on the Open Questions
>> part of this thread/the next meeting.
>>
>> -Toshio
>>
> You are right we reached some conclusion on conflicts and replace, but
> what if we want for example new v8? We have terribly old v8 in current
> Fedora and conflicts might be a good solution in this case.
This would be just a simple update. No conflicts required if I am not
mistaken right?
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Developer Experience
PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc.
http://cz.redhat.com
It depends what we want. Maybe updates are fine if users know Playground
means your system could be updated more than you thought.
Marcela