On 02/25/2014 07:23 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Okay, I started a requirements document for the playground
repository:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Playground_repository_%28dr...
There's three things that we need to do with this to make it useful for FESCo:
1) Add other things we need to decide on to the Open Questions. We
especially need things that will affect the work needed to implement
the repository but we can decide which things those are later.
2) Decide which features from the Open Questions we want to apply to
the Playground repository. Update the description section as we make
decisions.
3) Analyze what will be needed to implement the features we've decided
the Playground repository needs to have and fill in the Identified
Needs sections with that information.
-Toshio
_______________________________________________
env-and-stacks mailing list
env-and-stacks(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks
Thanks for the draft. I left comments to some points, but I'd rather
discuss it on next meeting, but because you probably won't be there...
My opinions on Open Questions:
* signing - sure we need to sign (copr requirement)
* I would prefer rolling updates and no testing repository. It's
Playground, bugs can be there.
* I don't know what's mirrormanager. Mirroring to all Fedora mirrors? I
guess we don't need it at start.
* self hosting - no, I guess we don't have to ship BuildRequires in
Playground repo. It can do shipping of some packages easier.
* no reviews! It should be quick and easy. Maybe someone else than owner
of copr repo should approve new projects, which will go into Playground.
Maybe cla+1 could mean automatic push into Playground if user click on
button Playground.
Marcela