[Bug 1952727] New: daewoo-misc are (potentially) proprietary

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952727 Bug ID: 1952727 Summary: daewoo-misc are (potentially) proprietary Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Version: CentOS Stream Status: ASSIGNED Component: xorg-x11-fonts Assignee: peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com Reporter: peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com QA Contact: desktop-qa-list(a)redhat.com CC: airlied(a)redhat.com, ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com, extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jglisse(a)redhat.com, negativo17(a)gmail.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, xgl-maint(a)redhat.com Depends On: 1952723 Target Milestone: beta Classification: Red Hat Pool ID: sst_graphics_infrastructure_rhel_9 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1952723 +++ Description of problem: The daewoo-misc fonts are potentially proprietary, the only information in COPYING is: "Copyright (c) 1987, 1988 Daewoo Electronics Co.,Ltd." These fonts were first present in X11R5 (1991), see the fonts/bdf/misc/hanglg16.bdf file and similar. The COPYING file we use now is from the COPYRIGHT line in the .bdf file, other fonts (e.g. the schumacher ones) seem to have COMMENT: lines to explain the terms. I can't find any other information about license terms for this font but given the age of the copyright notice, I'm not very hopeful either. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xorg-x11-fonts-7.5-30.fc34 Additional info: Upstream issue filed here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/font/daewoo-misc/-/issues/1 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952723 [Bug 1952723] daewoo-misc are (potentially) proprietary -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.