October 2008 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh | |at.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(440volt.tux@gmail | |.com) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-10-26 08:29:28 EDT --- Needinfo till a package that conforms to the points listed in bug #461139 is made available -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(440volt.tux@gmail | |.com) --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-10-26 08:26:27 EDT --- I wanted to wait for a submission with a fixed name, but since I'm doing a font review run today anyway, here is a full review. (on http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/Thabit-fonts-0.02-3.fc9.src.rpm) 1. Please rename package to arabeyes-thabit-fonts 2. You have a typo in Summary 3. Is upstream's URL http://www.arabeyes.org/ or http://www.arabeyes.org/project.php?proj=Khotot (as referenced in the README) ? 4. Is the description still ok for a Thabit-only package? 5. It's harmless, but a Source2 without Source1 is strange, especially on a new package 6. Please use normal %setup macro in your package. That will simplify the spec a lot (your complex manual unpacking was only necessary because you initially tried to stuff two fonts in a single package) 7. Since upstream uses fontforge for building, please ask upstream to publish sfd sources and build fedora fonts from those sources (we have many packages that do so, for example DejaVu, Liberation, Inconsolata, etc) 8. Some people want all Fedora-added source files in a package to be prefixed with the package name. You don't follow this convention for your fontconfig file. Please use %{name}-fontconfig.conf as suggested by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate 9. I don't know if 65 is the right fontconfig priority for this font. You need to discuss it with Behdad (preferably CC-ing the fedora fonts list) 10. Please only declare thabit-related fontconfig rules in the fontconfig file shipped with the thabit package 11. You probably want a "Generic name" rule in addition to the "Registering a font in default families" rule in your fontconfig file → http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names This rule is used by fontconfig to complete your font with glyphs from other fonts when it encounters a codepoint your font is missing → http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Registering_a_fon... This rule is used by fontconfig to identify what fonts to use when an application requests a "cursive" font. 12. Please reformat your xml files with xmllint --format before submission so they are nicely indented with the same rules as other font packages 13. When you've written fontconfig rules you're happy with it's always a good idea to send them upstream to be included in the font next releases (in the versionned source archive you're supposed to request) 14. You can drop the -f flag to fc-cache for releases ≥ Fedora 9 15. OFL.txt mentions an IBM copyright. Please ask upstream to add a Fontlog.txt to their source release archive (as recommended by SIL for OFL fonts), that clearly identifies what other fonts were used to create this font, so Fedora Legal can check there is no problem 16. Please make sure all the steps up to 2.a (included) have been followed in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle In particular we need a wiki page that describes the font to be added to the wiki (for release notes) Well that's a lot of stuff to fix and it's a pity the OLPC folks didn't do a full review before accepting this font package. I'm putting a "NEEDINFO reporter" on this bug and the Mothanna one (since it needs more or less the same fixes). Please remove this flag once you've fixed the previous points. Please don't hesitate to ask questions on the fedora fonts list if there are elements you need help with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 453093] gcin gtk immodule should not be used for all locale

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453093 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |notting(a)redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 253149] fonts-japanese should be renamed to japanese-bitmap-fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253149 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |notting(a)redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-24 15:43:44 EDT --- Verified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #5 from Lillian Angel <langel(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-24 08:24:18 EDT --- It will be in F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466430] Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 --- Comment #2 from Caius CHANCE <cchance(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-24 02:38:17 EDT --- http://code.google.com/p/ibus/issues/detail?id=155&sort=-id -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467984] New: kdesdk-utils should not depends on kdelibs etc

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: kdesdk-utils should not depends on kdelibs etc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467984 Summary: kdesdk-utils should not depends on kdelibs etc Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: kdesdk AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rdieter(a)math.unl.edu, than(a)redhat.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, jfearn(a)redhat.com, lvillani(a)binaryhelix.net, smparrish(a)shallowcreek.net, ltinkl(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Installing kdesdk-utils pulls in a bunch of kde packages which it should not depends on AFAIK. Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install kdesdk-utils 2. inspect source for po2xml etc 3. look at koji build log Actual results: 1. pulls in kdelibs and bunch of other core kde packages 2. does not include any kde include files 3. links explicitly to /usr/lib/kde4/devel/libkdecore.so http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/kdesdk/4.1.2/2.fc10/data/logs/... Expected results: 1. not to pull in megabytes of kde packages 3. not to link to libkdecore Additional info: The debian package does not depend on kde: http://packages.debian.org/experimental/poxml This is also affects F9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466117] [ro] system-config-language should set correct default entry in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466117 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #17 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-23 11:49:23 EDT --- If you already have a different layout selected in your session, the gdm selection won't override your session configuration. That is because we can't know if the user intentionally choose a different layout on the login screen, or just overlooked the combobox, causing it to carry the system default layout. Either use the keyboard capplet (system > preferences > hardare >keyboard) to pick the correct layout in the session, once, or remove the session settings altogether (e.g. by removing ~/.gconf - but that looses all your other session settings as well, so be careful). If you do that, the gdm layout _will_ be transferred in the session the next time you log in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466117] [ro] system-config-language should set correct default entry in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466117 Chris Lumens <clumens(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmccann(a)redhat.com, | |rstrode(a)redhat.com Component|anaconda |gdm AssignedTo|anaconda-maint-list@redhat. |jmccann(a)redhat.com |com | --- Comment #16 from Chris Lumens <clumens(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-23 10:05:06 EDT --- These issues sound like they're related to gdm. Reassigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs October 2008