[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466871] New: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466871
Summary: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload"
configuration
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
ibus-setup has checkboxes for started and preload but I think this is too
complicated for most used and they should just be merged into one option for
simplicity since that is generally what one wants. Maybe a start/stop toggle
button could be added instead of started if it is useful - that would make the
UI much clearer anyway: then selecting an engine should probably start it
automatically and users could stop it temporarily if necessary by clicking on
toggle state button.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. go to engines setup to choose engines
Actual results:
two sets of confusing checkboxes
Expected results:
single checkbox per engine
Additional info:
Being able to start/stop engines dynamically from the setup is a nice feature.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 3 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473615] New: ibus-table : Unowned directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus-table : Unowned directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473615
Summary: ibus-table : Unowned directories
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: ibus-table
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
One or more directories are not included within this
package and/or its sub-packages:
=> ibus-table-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/ibus-table
/usr/share/ibus-table/engine
/usr/share/ibus-table/tables
/usr/share/ibus-table/icons
=> ibus-table-additional-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch
(rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/ibus-table
/usr/share/ibus-table/tables
/usr/share/ibus-table/icons
=> ibus-table-chinese-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/ibus-table
/usr/share/ibus-table/tables
/usr/share/ibus-table/icons
/usr/share/ibus-table/data
Note: It might be necessary to only add them to the main package.
[...]
Further information:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwner...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 3 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477581] New: iok should avoid resizing when changing maps
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: iok should avoid resizing when changing maps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477581
Summary: iok should avoid resizing when changing maps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: iok
AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
When one switching keyboard map iok tends to change size a fair bit.
It would be better if it allowed for the character size and avoided
resizing itself as far as possible.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. run iok and switch map
Actual results:
window resizes each time map is changed
Expected results:
window size to stay fixed.
Additional info:
I know some Lohit fonts for example are larger than others, but at least should
try to avoid resizing when switching between English and Indic.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 3 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475063] New: UI issues in iok
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: UI issues in iok
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475063
Summary: UI issues in iok
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: iok
AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mclasen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Some issues I noticed while I briefly looked at iok:
- First a general issue: I believe it would be much more useful if iok would
appear less like a normal unfocused application window, and more like some
special desktop component. Ie, I would remove the window title and menubar, and
maybe place the window at some fixed place, e.g. above the bottom panel
(compare matchbox-keyboard).
- It seems somewhat pointless to have an "Advanced Options" check menuitem with
the sole purpose of hiding and showing another menu. Also, I wonder why you
think that "Open" is less advanced than "Save".
- The buttons are pretty hard to hit on a big screen,since they don't reserve
any extra size beyond the dimensions of the character. (compare
gnome-calculator, which does ensure that its buttons have reasonable size)
- The entries in the combobox should be translatable language names, like
"Assamese", not technobabble like "as-inscript". If you use the iso-codes
package for this, you get translations of the language names for free.
- The "Open" menuitem doesn't give any guidance as to what kind of file you are
expected to open. I'd recommend to make that "Open keymap", add a filter to the
filechooser that only shows .mim files, and opening the file chooser in the
/usr/share/m17n directory.
- "Save keymap" would be better if it opened a file chooser in save mode, and
proposed a filename like 'modified-as-inscript.mim'.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 3 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477451] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: samyak-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 3 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477465] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: thaifonts-scalable
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 3 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 477044
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
After more than a month of consultation,
feedback and tweaking new font packaging guidelines have been approved
by FESCO.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Package maintainers must now convert their packages in rawhide to the new
templates.
The following packages have already been converted in rawhide and can
serve as examples if the templates published in the fontpackages-devel package
are not clear enough:
❄ andika-fonts
❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts
❄ bitstream-vera-fonts
❄ charis-fonts
❄ dejavu-fonts
❄ ecolier-court-fonts
❄ edrip-fonts
❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts
❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts
❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts
❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts
❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts
❄ gfs-complutum-fonts
❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts
❄ gfs-didot-fonts
❄ gfs-eustace-fonts
❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts
❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts
❄ gfs-gazis-fonts
❄ gfs-jackson-fonts
❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts
❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts
❄ gfs-olga-fonts
❄ gfs-porson-fonts
❄ gfs-solomos-fonts
❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts
❄ stix-fonts
❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
FPC and FESCO were not consulted on splitting or renaming packages,
nevertheless the new templates make it fare easier to manage subpackages, so
you're strongly encouraged to split your packages along font family lines.
A mandatory rule about splitting will probably be submitted for approval before
the F11 release.
Further information on fonts packaging changes will be published on
fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 3 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475127] New: Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475127
Summary: Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of
ibus-gtk
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: yshao(a)redhat.com, eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,
phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Because installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk, users
who are using Gnome could not have it operates.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ibus-0.1.1.20081023-1.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to gnome-terminal: alt-f2 > input 'gnome-terminal'
2. Login as root: input 'su -'
3. Yum install ibus: input 'yum install ibus' > input 'y'
4. Try to start ibus with im-chooser: input 'im-chooser'
5. Check results.
Actual results:
ibus is not usable on Gnome.
Expected results:
ibus is usable on Gnome.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477579] New: iok should default to map of current locale
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: iok should default to map of current locale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477579
Summary: iok should default to map of current locale
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: iok
AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
iok currently defaults to "English" irrespective of the locale.
It should default to the map of the current locale if it exists.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.0.9
Steps to Reproduce:
1. LANG=hi_IN.UTF-8 iok
Actual results:
starts up in English
Expected results:
should default to Hindi map.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months