February 2018 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1333480] Eclipse won't start a fresh workspace

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333480 Alex Villacís Lasso <alexvillacislasso(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment|0 |1 #1183145 is| | obsolete| | --- Comment #37 from Alex Villacís Lasso <alexvillacislasso(a)hotmail.com> --- Created attachment 1397972 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1397972&action=edit Eclipse log after installing eclipse-nls-es and trying to start This is still happening to me in Fedora 27. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1546706] New: fcitx-qt5 and kcm-fcitx conflicts with qt5-qtbase 5.9.4

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546706 Bug ID: 1546706 Summary: fcitx-qt5 and kcm-fcitx conflicts with qt5-qtbase 5.9.4 Product: Fedora Version: 27 Component: fcitx-qt5 Severity: high Assignee: robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com Reporter: clxcoltz(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fcitx-qt5-1.1.1-1.fc27.x86_64 How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: 1.`sudo dnf upgrade` on a F27 with KDE and fcitx to reproduce 2.fcitx-qt5 will refuse to install citing conflict: citing ``sudo dnf upgrade` on a F27 with KDE and fcitx to reproduce` 3.kcm-fcitx-0.5.5-1.fc27.x86_64 faces a similar problem with `cannot install both qt5-qtbase-5.9.4-1.fc27.x86_64 and qt5-qtbase-5.9.1-9.fc27.x86_64` Actual results: qt5 cannot be upgraded to 5.9.4, so neither can all the KDE packages that depend on it. In case of forcing upgrade using --allowerasing, fcitx will be removed, disabling Chinese input. Expected results: fcitx-qt5 should have its dependency updated to allow qt 5.9.4, and so should kcm-fcitx. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 2 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1544432] New: Should not install srpm macros for update

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544432 Bug ID: 1544432 Summary: Should not install srpm macros for update Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ibus Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Reporter: darrellpf(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com dnf update ibus Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:54 ago on Mon 12 Feb 2018 05:08:58 AM PST. Dependencies resolved. ============================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================================================================== Upgrading: ibus x86_64 1.5.17-7.fc28 koji 5.0 M ibus-gtk2 x86_64 1.5.17-7.fc28 koji 56 k ibus-gtk3 x86_64 1.5.17-7.fc28 koji 56 k ibus-libs x86_64 1.5.17-7.fc28 koji 248 k ibus-setup noarch 1.5.17-7.fc28 koji 91 k ibus-wayland x86_64 1.5.17-7.fc28 koji 52 k Installing dependencies: annobin x86_64 3.4-1.fc28 koji 66 k dwz x86_64 0.12-5.fc27 koji 106 k fpc-srpm-macros noarch 1.1-3.fc27 koji 7.1 k ghc-srpm-macros noarch 1.4.2-6.fc27 koji 7.9 k gnat-srpm-macros noarch 4-4.fc27 koji 8.4 k go-srpm-macros noarch 2-10.fc27 koji 8.0 k nim-srpm-macros noarch 1-1.fc28 koji 7.6 k ocaml-srpm-macros noarch 5-2.fc27 koji 7.8 k openblas-srpm-macros noarch 2-2.fc27 koji 6.6 k perl-srpm-macros noarch 1-24.fc27 koji 9.3 k python-srpm-macros noarch 3-25.fc28 koji 10 k qt5-srpm-macros noarch 5.10.0-4.fc28 koji 9.3 k redhat-rpm-config noarch 95-1.fc28 koji 75 k rust-srpm-macros noarch 5-1.fc28 koji 8.0 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================================================================== Install 14 Packages Upgrade 6 Packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 2 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1543670] New: m17n-lib-1.8.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543670 Bug ID: 1543670 Summary: m17n-lib-1.8.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: m17n-lib Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mfabian(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 1.8.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.8.0-0.1.RC1.fc28 URL: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/m17n/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1870/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 2 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1543669] New: m17n-db-1.8.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543669 Bug ID: 1543669 Summary: m17n-db-1.8.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: m17n-db Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 1.8.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.8.0-0.1.RC1.fc28 URL: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/m17n/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1869/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 2 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1541288] New: RFE: Many status symbol in first row of candidate windows

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541288 Bug ID: 1541288 Summary: RFE: Many status symbol in first row of candidate windows Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ibus-typing-booster Assignee: mfabian(a)redhat.com Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: anish.developer(a)gmail.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mfabian(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1389990 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1389990&action=edit Image showing status symbols Description of problem: Its difficult to understand all status symbols. May be we can just keep 1 or 2 status system. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-typing-booster-1.5.34-1.fc27.noarch How reproducible: everytime. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Enable Emoji, predictions 2. 3. Actual results: 4 symbols in status Expected results: Only 1 or 2. Additional info: This appears as a noise. AS far as i think, even if we remove it, it will not affect user experience much. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 2 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1533914] New: [ghostscript-chinese] retirement of the package

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533914 Bug ID: 1533914 Summary: [ghostscript-chinese] retirement of the package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghostscript-chinese Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com Reporter: dkaspar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In the past, the Ghostscript did not have such a good support for substitutions of glyphs in CJK-based documents, in case the document itself was missing embedded fonts (that are capable of correctly rendering the document's text). This was one of the reasons why the 'ghostscript-chinese' package was created AFAICT. Nowadays, upstream has added their default solution for this issue in the Ghostscript, by using Google's Droid Sans Font Fallback for glyphs substitution. And we have reached a point where it is now expected for PS/PDF and other documents' formats to have the font typefaces embedded in the document when users are not using fonts that are not widely available. That's because the fonts substitutions will never be perfect, because it always be just a workaround. Ghostscript package, starting by version ghostscript-9.22-4.fc28, no longer has the support for conf.d/ package. And we should try to make an effort to convince text applications developers to start embedding "exotic" fonts into documents by default. Based on the reasons above, I'm hereby requesting for retirement of 'ghostscript-chinese' package, as it is no longer needed. The package should be retired for Fedora 28 and onward. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghostscript-chinese-0.4.0-9.fc27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 2 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 499358] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error.

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499358 Takayoshi Kimura <tkimura(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|1541222 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541222 [Bug 1541222] Unnecessary docker_image_availability performed on non-containerized etcd nodes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 499358] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error.

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499358 Takayoshi Kimura <tkimura(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1541222 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541222 [Bug 1541222] Unnecessary docker_image_availability performed on non-containerized etcd nodes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1539217] New: fcitx-qt5-1.2.2 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539217 Bug ID: 1539217 Summary: fcitx-qt5-1.2.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fcitx-qt5 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com Latest upstream release: 1.2.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.2.1-2.fc28 URL: https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx-qt5 Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/6513/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 3 months

1
3
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs February 2018