[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1833858] Hangul Jamo is seperated and printed respectively
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833858
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje
| |ct.org, klember(a)redhat.com,
| |moceap(a)hotmail.com,
| |pnemade(a)redhat.com,
| |psatpute(a)redhat.com
Component|google-droid-fonts |harfbuzz
Assignee|nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net |pnemade(a)redhat.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> ---
Since I doubt Google would have published Droid for more than a decade with
borken Hangul, probably a problem shaper side
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1823637] Terminus fonts broken after terminus-fonts-4.48-5.fc32.noarch update
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823637
Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(tagoh(a)redhat.com) |
--- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> ---
Sorry for late response, I was away from my computer for a while.
(In reply to Hans Ulrich Niedermann from comment #14)
> Let me try to summarize this bug's discussions with my limited understanding
> of the font software stack:
>
> 1. The original poster mainly had an issue with fontconfig/ostree which
> resulted in his gnome-terminal dialog showing only small rectangular glyphs
> instead of "Terminus Medium", "Terminus Bold", and the
> invented-by-the-software-stack "Terminus Bold Italic". This appears to have
> been solved over in fontconfig/ostree land, so the main part of this bug
> looks like a duplicate of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750891 to me, and definitively
> outside the scope of what the terminus-fonts package is responsible for.
Not exactly. this isn't ostree specific. when system has same font families in
different formats, fontconfig prioritize them from various aspects though,
FC_FONTFORMAT which is a priperty in cacche containing the font format is one
of factors. but it do compare strings so far. so there are the case that
fontconfig returns a bitmap font as the best font instead of OpenType and
applications didn't just support the synthethic emboldening for such fonts.
I thought so far fontconfig could intentionally gives a lower priority to
bitmap fonts than OpenType fonts though, someone may also intentionally wants
to use bitmap fonts rather than OpenType fonts. I need to think about how to
implement it. thus, conditionally installing one of them in the packaging level
was a workaround.
> 2. The original poster also had a completely different issue with what
> Akira TAGOH calls Pango/freetype in which the presence of *.pcf.gz files
> breaks the "Terminus Italic" invented by what appears to be pango/freetype.
> As this issue has been reappearing and is going to reappear until the last
> piece of software using pre-pango font rendering has disappeared from at
> least Fedora, if not the planet, I have created
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827905 to track that part. So
> the secondary part of this bug looks like a duplicate of 1827905 to me.
Right. but that "the secondary part" is actually main thing for this. the
comment#1 and relevant comments were the off-topic for this.
> Akira TAGOH, sorry to bother you again here, but you appear to be the one
> with the knowledge to actually help with this. I would not even know where
> to start reading documentation.
Sorry for that. that is one of my tasks I need to improve fontconfig
documentation.
> You have mentioned above "Disable embolden flag for certain apps". Where
> would this flag be located? And in this case, terminus-fonts already
> provides "Terminus Medium" and "Terminus Bold", so I cannot se where
> "embolden" should play a part here, but might there be a "italicize" flag
> somewhere? Maybe an "italicizes flag for certain fonts"? That could prevent
> the secondary issue number 2.
Well, enumerating everything in config isn't actually realistic but one could
do for example (not tested):
<match>
<test name="family"><string>Terminus</string></test>
<test name="prgname"><string>gnome-terminal</string></test>
<edit name="fontformat" mode="prepend"><string>TrueType</string></edit>
</match>
As I commented for 1., this should be fixed/improved in fontconfig as well...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1833719] New: Please consider adding Monoid font
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833719
Bug ID: 1833719
Summary: Please consider adding Monoid font
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Status: NEW
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Reporter: luke.hutch(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Please consider adding the MIT/SIL-licensed monospace font Monoid to Fedora:
https://github.com/larsenwork/monoid
(I don't see a relevant component to add this bug to -- sorry to file it
against liberation-fonts)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1767499] New: Very bad kerning for Tahoma in Fedora 31
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767499
Bug ID: 1767499
Summary: Very bad kerning for Tahoma in Fedora 31
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Status: NEW
Component: pango
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: aros(a)gmx.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1631087
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1631087&action=edit
Tahoma as rendered by Pango 1.44 in Fedora 31
This is how Tahoma font is rendered in Fedora 31.
After downgrading to pango-1.43.0-4.fc30.x86_64.rpm the issue disappears.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years