June 2023 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2213445] New: [abrt] ibus: bus_panel_proxy_new(): ibus-daemon killed by SIGSEGV

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213445 Bug ID: 2213445 Summary: [abrt] ibus: bus_panel_proxy_new(): ibus-daemon killed by SIGSEGV Product: Fedora Version: 38 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Whiteboard: abrt_hash:97c7e53903e6b65f8d933ef49d8f102572e9296d;VAR IANT_ID=workstation; Component: ibus Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Reporter: mf.flip(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Version-Release number of selected component: ibus-1.5.28-4.fc38 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.17.10 backtrace_rating: 4 rootdir: / runlevel: unknown cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-42.slice/session-c1.scope cmdline: ibus-daemon --panel disable package: ibus-1.5.28-4.fc38 executable: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon uid: 42 kernel: 6.2.14-300.fc38.x86_64 type: CCpp journald_cursor: s=d12eacebd79d4d6abc84960311a52c87;i=6e2e14;b=4fa16c50182746379e644c053f23cf68;m=102a101;t=5fb798c2a8901;x=10f6d55f20eb12ec reason: ibus-daemon killed by SIGSEGV crash_function: bus_panel_proxy_new Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (8 frames) #0 bus_panel_proxy_new at /usr/src/debug/ibus-1.5.28-5.fc38.x86_64/bus/panelproxy.c:150 #1 _dbus_name_owner_changed_cb at /usr/src/debug/ibus-1.5.28-5.fc38.x86_64/bus/ibusimpl.c:505 #3 signal_emit_unlocked_R.isra.0 at ../gobject/gsignal.c:3812 #6 bus_name_service_set_primary_owner at /usr/src/debug/ibus-1.5.28-5.fc38.x86_64/bus/dbusimpl.c:378 #7 bus_dbus_impl_request_name at /usr/src/debug/ibus-1.5.28-5.fc38.x86_64/bus/dbusimpl.c:1127 #8 call_in_idle_cb at ../gio/gdbusconnection.c:5000 #12 g_main_context_iterate.isra.0 at ../glib/gmain.c:4276 #14 bus_server_run at /usr/src/debug/ibus-1.5.28-5.fc38.x86_64/bus/server.c:363 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213445 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 2213613] New: needs font conf for lang Urdu

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213613 Bug ID: 2213613 Summary: needs font conf for lang Urdu Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: nafees-naskh-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The nafees-naskh-fonts package does not any fontconfig configuration for Urdu. So it is not easily recognised as a Urdu font. I suspect the same may be true for other Nafees fonts packages too. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213613 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2113535] New: nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f37

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113535 Bug ID: 2113535 Summary: nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f37 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2045102 (F37FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f37 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89834797 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild Please fix nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 38, nafees-pakistani-naskh-fonts will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai... Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045102 [Bug 2045102] Fedora 37 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113535

11 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 2113537] New: nafees-riqa-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f37

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113537 Bug ID: 2113537 Summary: nafees-riqa-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f37 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: nafees-riqa-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2045102 (F37FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora nafees-riqa-fonts failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f37 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89834806 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild Please fix nafees-riqa-fonts at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, nafees-riqa-fonts will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 38, nafees-riqa-fonts will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai... Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045102 [Bug 2045102] Fedora 37 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113537

11 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 2135406] Packages using /usr/bin/g-ir-scanner will fail to build without distutils

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2135406 David King <amigadave(a)amigadave.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|ERRATA |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2135406

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2154819] New: ibus fails to build with Python 3.12: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils'

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154819 Bug ID: 2154819 Summary: ibus fails to build with Python 3.12: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: ibus Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Reporter: thrnciar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com, thrnciar(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2135404 (PYTHON3.12) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora ibus fails to build with Python 3.12.0a3. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/g-ir-scanner", line 94, in <module> from giscanner.utils import dll_dirs File "/usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/utils.py", line 355, in <module> import distutils.cygwinccompiler ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils' Remove the distutils package. It was deprecated in Python 3.10 by PEP 632 “Deprecate distutils module”. For projects still using distutils and cannot be updated to something else, the setuptools project can be installed: it still provides distutils. (Contributed by Victor Stinner in gh-92584.) If your package is listed in [0], you may workaround this issue by BuildRequiring python-setuptols, note that adding such BuildRequires might however hide some transitive dependency problem, if the distutils import comes from a dependency. Cooperation with upstream is recommended. Additional context [1]. [0] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedorapr... [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedorapr... https://docs.python.org/3.12/whatsnew/3.12.html For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.12/fedora... For all our attempts to build ibus with Python 3.12, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.12/package/ibus/ Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.12: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.12/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.12 is planned to be included in Fedora 39. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.12. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2135404 [Bug 2135404] Python 3.12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154819

11 months, 1 week

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 2135406] Packages using /usr/bin/g-ir-scanner will fail to build without distutils

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2135406 David King <amigadave(a)amigadave.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2022-12-20 12:00:36 |2023-06-07 11:06:49 --- Comment #13 from David King <amigadave(a)amigadave.com> --- There is already bug 2208966 open for this (as the test wuite was enabled after this change). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2135406 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2135406] Packages using /usr/bin/g-ir-scanner will fail to build without distutils

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2135406 Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|RAWHIDE |--- Keywords| |Reopened --- Comment #12 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> --- If broken, let's keep this open. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2135406 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2135406] Packages using /usr/bin/g-ir-scanner will fail to build without distutils

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2135406 --- Comment #11 from Petr Viktorin <pviktori(a)redhat.com> --- Maybe we can solve this properly upstream. I can also provide a crude patch to unblock the Python 3.12 rebuild in Fedora, if this happens with the Python/setuptools we end up with. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2135406 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2135406] Packages using /usr/bin/g-ir-scanner will fail to build without distutils

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2135406 Petr Viktorin <pviktori(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pviktori(a)redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Petr Viktorin <pviktori(a)redhat.com> --- setuptools internally ends up imports `inspect`, which needs `ast`. When giscanner/ is in PYTHONPATH (as it is in tests), it provides its own top-level `ast.py`, overriding the standard library with an incompatible module. Tests will fail. Upstream bug: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/429 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2135406 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs June 2023