Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Can't open skk-e21.el
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
Summary: Can't open skk-e21.el Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ddskk AssignedTo: petersen@redhat.com ReportedBy: yamato@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: petersen@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=345907) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345907) Fixes this bug.
Description of problem:
To use ddskk(ddskk-12.2.0-12.fc11.noarch) on emacs(emacs-22.3-11.fc11.x86_64), emacs complains "Can't find skk-e21.el".
In SKK-MK of the ddskk package , which is part of ddskk build system, the version number of emacs is checked to decide whether skk-e21.el should be installed or not. The SKK-MK expects emacs-21 to install skk-e21.el. However, emacs on F11 is emacs-22. There is a gap.
Attached patch is taken from upstream skk code. In the patch mule version is checked instead of emacs version to decide whether skk-e21.el should be installed or not.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ddskk-12.2.0-12.fc11.noarch emacs-22.3-11.fc11.x86_64
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce: 1. install the packages. 2. emacs 3. M-x load-library: skk
Actual results:
"Can't find skk-e21.el" is messaged.
Expected results:
Skk works fine.
Additional info:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-06-22 02:09:57 EDT --- Thanks for the patch.
Unfortunately the xemacs part of the build has been breaking fedora builds of ddskk for a long time now - I guess I should just disable xemacs-ddskk for now...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-06-22 02:11:42 EDT --- ddskk should also be renamed to emacs-ddskk or emacs-common-ddskk, which probably needs a new package review... I don't suppose you are interested in maintaining it for fedora, Yamato-san? :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-06-22 02:45:48 EDT ---
Unfortunately the xemacs part of the build has been breaking fedora builds of ddskk for a long time now
Ok, I was confused and thinking about ddskk-13.1 I haven't been able to build yet successfully for fedora.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428775
I'll backport this to f11 and f10.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-22 02:57:40 EDT --- ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta@iki.fi
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-06-22 04:08:07 EDT ---
Ok, I was confused and thinking about ddskk-13.1 I haven't been able to build yet successfully for fedora.
Nevermind, I finally built ddskk-13.1 for rawhide but had to drop xemacs since it is still on apel-10.6.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428851
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-22 04:11:53 EDT --- ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ville.skytta@iki.fi |loganjerry@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi 2009-06-22 10:35:31 EDT --- (Changing Cc to current Fedora XEmacs maintainer.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #9 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com 2009-06-22 12:45:11 EDT --- I will take a look at upgrading XEmacs to apel 10.7.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-24 15:42:33 EDT --- ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |12.2.0-13.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-03 15:36:25 EDT --- ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #12 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com 2009-10-28 13:34:47 EDT --- XEmacs has apel 10.7 in F-11+ now, if that matters. I'm willing to help with any further problems.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-10-29 03:56:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12)
XEmacs has apel 10.7 in F-11+ now, if that matters.
Thanks - good to know, but xemacs-packages-extra.spec still provides apel-xemacs = 10.6-6.
Also build still fails after that: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1775997&name=build.log
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-10-29 04:11:03 EDT --- more info on the failed build if it helps: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1775997
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #15 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com 2009-10-29 10:51:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13)
Thanks - good to know, but xemacs-packages-extra.spec still provides apel-xemacs = 10.6-6.
Oops. I've got a font bugfix coming, so I'll fix this at the same time.
Also build still fails after that: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1775997&name=build.log
Okay, I'll take a look. Thanks for trying.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #16 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com 2009-10-29 12:19:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366657) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366657) Patch to support building with XEmacs
This patch makes a couple of path changes in SKK-CFG for XEmacs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #17 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com 2009-10-29 12:20:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366658) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366658) Source patch for XEmacs
This patch changes two instances of a character defined using the Emacs-only syntax ?\xABC into the syntax ?\uABCD, which is supported by both Emacs and XEmacs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-29 16:28:36 EDT --- xemacs-packages-extra-20090217-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xemacs-packages-extra-20090217-3.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #19 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com 2009-10-29 16:30:39 EDT --- I've pushed new builds into F-11, F-12, and devel that fix the apel-xemacs provides. I've submitted F-11 to testing and requested that the F-12 build be tagged into f12-final. That plus the patches in comment 16 and comment 17 fix everything for me. Let me know if there is anything else I can do.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503185
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-11 10:03:10 EDT --- xemacs-packages-extra-20090217-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org