Notification time stamped 2021-02-22 18:54:26 UTC
==========================================
#fedora-blocker-review: F34-blocker-review
==========================================
Meeting started by adamw at 17:07:41 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2021-02-22/f34-bl...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (adamw, 17:07:41)
* for Beta, we have: (adamw, 17:14:53)
* 6 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 17:14:58)
* 2 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 17:15:03)
* for Final, we have: (adamw, 17:15:17)
* 2 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 17:15:22)
* 3 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 17:15:22)
* coremodule will secretarialize, thanks! (adamw, 17:15:48)
* Proposed Beta blockers (adamw, 17:16:06)
* +4 votes in ticket from frantisekz, bcotton, imsedgar and lruzicka
(adamw, 17:17:33)
* AGREED: 1929940 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violates Basic criterion
"It must be possible to configure a Fedora Server system installed
according to the above criteria as a FreeIPA domain controller,
using the official deployment tools provided in the distribution
FreeIPA packages" (adamw, 17:21:24)
* (1929940) FreeIPA server deployment fails in current F34 and Rawhide
composes (adamw, 17:24:25)
* AGREED: 1929940 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violates Basic criterion
"It must be possible to configure a Fedora Server system installed
according to the above criteria as a FreeIPA domain controller,
using the official deployment tools provided in the distribution
FreeIPA packages" (adamw, 17:24:39)
* (1929564) [abrt] gnome-control-center: g_settings_set_property():
gnome-control-center killed by SIGTRAP (adamw, 17:24:51)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929564 (adamw,
17:25:00)
* LINK:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/237 (adamw,
17:25:06)
* Proposed Blocker, gnome-control-center, NEW (adamw, 17:25:14)
* AGREED: 1929564 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) AcceptedBlocker
(Final) - we agree this doesn't quite violate the Basic or Beta
criteria, but does violate Final criterion "All applications...must
start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test", and as
it's a significant visible bug it would be desirable to fix it for
Beta also (adamw, 17:31:56)
* (1930977) [abrt] gnome-shell: nouveau_fence_signalled(): gnome-shell
killed by SIGSEGV (adamw, 17:32:49)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930977 (adamw,
17:32:55)
* LINK:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/241 (adamw,
17:33:02)
* Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (adamw, 17:33:07)
* AGREED: 1930977 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violates Basic criterion
"A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a
log in screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop
using a user account created during installation or a 'first boot'
utility" for a supported aarch64 platform (adamw, 17:40:05)
* (1931070) sddm crashes with mesa-21 on VMware (adamw, 17:40:13)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931070 (adamw,
17:40:19)
* LINK:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/236 (adamw,
17:40:24)
* Proposed Blocker, mesa, NEW (adamw, 17:40:29)
* AGREED: 1931070 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta), punt (delay
decision) on blocker status - we think this is serious enough to be
an FE at least, but not sure yet if it's wide enough in impact to
constitute a blocker. punting for more testing and also to look at
fixing it (adamw, 17:53:05)
* (1931384) No audio on Fedora 34 after pipewire 0.3.22-4 has been
installed. (adamw, 17:53:15)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931384 (adamw,
17:53:20)
* LINK:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/239 (adamw,
17:53:25)
* Proposed Blocker, pipewire, ASSIGNED (adamw, 17:53:29)
* AGREED: 1931384 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException
(Beta) - as the affected package is not installed in any default F32
or F33 install, this does not violate the release criteria, but
since it is known to be pulled in by popular third-party packages,
we feel it's worth an FE to improve the upgrade situation during
freeze if possible (adamw, 18:09:40)
* (1930978) [abrt] xorg-x11-server-Xorg: System(): Xorg killed by
SIGABRT (adamw, 18:09:57)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930978 (adamw,
18:10:32)
* LINK:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/242 (adamw,
18:10:37)
* Proposed Blocker, xorg-x11-server, NEW (adamw, 18:10:42)
* AGREED: 1930978 - punt (delay decision) - we suspect this may be a
dupe of #1930977, we will punt while pwhalen works that out (adamw,
18:14:32)
* Proposed Beta freeze exceptions (adamw, 18:14:51)
* (1909556) reboot hangs for 2 minutes: stop job is running for User
Manager for UID 1000 (adamw, 18:14:57)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909556 (adamw,
18:15:04)
* LINK:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/238 (adamw,
18:15:20)
* Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gnome-session, POST (adamw, 18:15:22)
* AGREED: 1909556 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this affects live
images, and is rather annoying (adamw, 18:19:58)
* (1924908) Gnome session fails to start with "Oops, something went
wrong" on first boot (adamw, 18:20:07)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924908 (adamw,
18:20:13)
* LINK:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/240 (adamw,
18:20:17)
* Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gnome-session, NEW (adamw, 18:20:21)
* AGREED: 1924908 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this doesn't
prevent anything working in the end, but looks very bad as a first
impression (adamw, 18:27:54)
* Proposed Final Blockers (adamw, 18:28:24)
* (1930401) No update notifications shown when updates available (F34,
Rawhide) (adamw, 18:28:42)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930401 (adamw,
18:28:46)
* LINK:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/234 (adamw,
18:28:51)
* Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW (adamw, 18:28:55)
* LINK:
https://giphy.com/gifs/NCjISbEPFxm48/html5 (adamw, 18:36:42)
* AGREED: 1930401 - punt (delay decision) - this may not be broken but
rather the test may need updating for new heuristics in GNOME 40,
delaying decision while we work that out (adamw, 18:37:48)
* (1929643) logout after switch returns the user to console instead of
sddm (adamw, 18:38:11)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929643 (adamw,
18:38:15)
* LINK:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/235 (adamw,
18:38:24)
* Proposed Blocker, sddm, NEW (adamw, 18:38:29)
* AGREED: 1929643 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is held to violate
a combination of the "Shutting down, rebooting, logging in and
logging out must work..." and "User switching must work using the
mechanisms offered..." criteria as proposed in the bug; it seems
reasonable to expect both to work together. (adamw, 18:46:04)
* Open floor (adamw, 18:50:47)
Meeting ended at 18:54:26 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (151)
* lruzicka[m] (40)
* frantisekz (31)
* pwhalen (30)
* bcotton (19)
* zodbot (15)
* coremodule (13)
* tablepc (12)
* Southern_Gentlem (5)
* cmurf (4)
* lruzicka (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`:
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2021-02-22/f34-bl...
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/fmnmeetingminutes.id.fedorap...