================================================
#fedora-meeting-1: F24 Beta Go/No-Go meeting - 2
================================================
Meeting started by jkurik at 17:30:04 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-05-05/f24-beta-go...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (jkurik, 17:30:07)
* Purpose of this meeting (jkurik, 17:34:47)
* Purpose of this meeting is to check whether or not F24 Beta is ready
for shipment, according to the release criteria. (jkurik, 17:34:53)
* This is determined in a few ways: (jkurik, 17:34:58)
* No remaining blocker bugs (jkurik, 17:35:07)
* Release candidate compose is available (check
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6405 ) (jkurik, 17:35:08)
* Test matrices for Beta are fully completed (jkurik, 17:35:18)
* LINK:
https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/24/beta/buglist
(jkurik, 17:35:19)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Beta_1.6_Summary
(jkurik, 17:35:21)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Beta_1.6_Installation
(jkurik, 17:35:22)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Beta_1.6_Base
(jkurik, 17:35:24)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Beta_1.6_Server
(jkurik, 17:35:25)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Beta_1.6_Cloud
(jkurik, 17:35:27)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Beta_1.6_Desktop
(jkurik, 17:35:28)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Beta_1.6_Security_Lab
(jkurik, 17:35:30)
* Current status (jkurik, 17:36:53)
* The last compose (1.6) is missing XFce images. (note: XFce images
are not release blocking) (jkurik, 17:37:14)
* LINK:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6405#comment:9
(jkurik, 17:37:21)
* We also have four proposed blockers (jkurik, 17:37:27)
* LINK:
https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/24/beta/buglist
(jkurik, 17:37:32)
* Mini-Blocker Review (jkurik, 17:39:59)
* (1259953) _ped.IOException: Partition(s) 8 on /dev/mmcblk0 have been
written, but we have been unable to inform the kernel of the change,
probably because it/they are in use. As a result, the old
partition(s) will remain in use. You should reboot now before ...
(adamw, 17:40:44)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259953 (adamw,
17:40:44)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 17:40:44)
* AGREED: 1259953 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException
(Beta) - this is annoying but it's a fairly specific scenario with
an apparently safe workaround that we can document, which we reckon
is sufficiently good enough for Beta (adamw, 17:52:10)
* (1333131) gi.overrides.BlockDev.MDRaidError: Process reported exit
code 256: mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md/pv00:Perhaps a
running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group? (adamw,
17:52:18)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333131 (adamw,
17:52:18)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 17:52:18)
* ACTION: adamw to add test case to openqa covering this (dgilmore,
17:55:02)
* AGREED: 1333131 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException
(Beta) - as per 1259953 this is a fairly well-identified case with
an apparently reliable and simple workaround, we find that
acceptable for Beta (adamw, 18:02:01)
* (1331630) Anaconda crashed during installation (adamw, 18:02:18)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331630 (adamw,
18:02:18)
* Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, VERIFIED (adamw, 18:02:18)
* AGREED: 1331630 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - this was another crasher
in the case of installing over LVM-on-RAID, but it does not seem to
have a workaround besides manually destroying the existing layout,
so we consider it to be significant enough to constitute a criteria
violation for Beta as you cannot complete the install (adamw,
18:13:05)
* (1332623) breaks upgrade path (adamw, 18:17:23)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332623 (adamw,
18:17:23)
* Proposed Blocker, python-dateutil, ON_QA (adamw, 18:17:23)
* AGREED: 1332623 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) - no-one could reproduce
this with one of the release-blocking package sets in multiple
attempts (adamw, 18:26:37)
* there are no outstanding blockers in Beta-1.6. there is one
outstanding blocker in Beta-1.4 (adamw, 18:27:13)
* Test Matrices coverage (jkurik, 18:29:48)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Beta_1.6_Summary
(jkurik, 18:29:57)
* Active Directory client tests have not been run since Alpha (adamw,
18:37:45)
* Go/No-Go decision (jkurik, 19:29:17)
* AGREED: The Fedora_24_Beta_1.6 compose has been agreed as the GOLD
to be released as planned on May-10. (jkurik, 19:34:10)
* Open floor (jkurik, 19:46:05)
* ACTION: jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result (jkurik, 19:46:27)
Meeting ended at 19:48:04 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* adamw to add test case to openqa covering this
* jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* adamw
* adamw to add test case to openqa covering this
* jkurik
* jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (200)
* jkurik (103)
* nirik (60)
* sgallagh (57)
* dgilmore (35)
* pschindl (26)
* kparal (17)
* zodbot (10)
* linuxmodder (8)
* robyduck (6)
* garretraziel (6)
* cmurf (5)
* jpigface (1)
* satellit (1)
* coremodule (1)
* pwhalen (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`:
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-05-05/f24-beta-go...
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/fmnmeetingminutes.id.fedorap...