May 2012 - mingw - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 799398] New: SDL_Init not found in libSDL.dll.a

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: SDL_Init not found in libSDL.dll.a https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799398 Summary: SDL_Init not found in libSDL.dll.a Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: mingw32-SDL AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: salsaman(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: Compilation is broken Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: Create a dll which is statically linked with SDL, as follows: bin/sh ../../../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -fPIC -DPIC -DIS_MINGW=1 -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -Dmain=SDL_main -I/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/SDL -g -O2 -Wall -shared -fPIC -DPIC -module -avoid-version --tag=disable-static -no-undefined -Wl,/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL.dll.a -Wl,/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDLmain.a -o SDL.la -rpath "/usr/lib/lives/plugins/playback/video" SDL_la-SDL.lo libtool: link: i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -shared .libs/SDL_la-SDL.o -O2 -Wl,/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL.dll.a -Wl,/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDLmain.a -o .libs/SDL.dll -Wl,--enable-auto-image-base -Xlinker --out-implib -Xlinker .libs/SDL.dll.a This creates SDL.dll in .libs. No warnings are given about missing functions. Actual results: When SDL.dll is loaded and run under wine, it crashes with: wine: Call from 0x7bc4c100 to unimplemented function SDL.dll.SDL_Init, aborting wine: Unimplemented function SDL.dll.SDL_Init called at address 0x7bc4c100 (thread 0023), starting debugger... Unhandled exception: unimplemented function SDL.dll.SDL_Init called in 32-bit code (0x7bc4c100). Expected results: SDL_Init should be found inside libSDL.dll.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 2 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 795699] New: CVE-2012-0841 libxml2: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS [fedora-all]

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2012-0841 libxml2: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795699 Summary: CVE-2012-0841 libxml2: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: mingw32-libxml2 AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: huzaifas(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, veillard(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, drizt(a)land.ru Blocks: 787067 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora versions. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include this bug ID and the bug IDs of this bug's parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product (the top-level CVE bugs). Please mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=787067 Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. Only one tracking bug has been filed; please ensure that it is only closed when all affected versions are fixed. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 2 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 806271] New: CVE-2012-1144 freetype: insufficient checking of first outline point in TTF parser (#35689) [fedora-all]

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2012-1144 freetype: insufficient checking of first outline point in TTF parser (#35689) [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806271 Summary: CVE-2012-1144 freetype: insufficient checking of first outline point in TTF parser (#35689) [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Component: mingw32-freetype AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: thoger(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 800607 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora versions. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include this bug ID and the bug IDs of this bug's parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product (the top-level CVE bugs). Please mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=800607 Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. Only one tracking bug has been filed; please ensure that it is only closed when all affected versions are fixed. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 3 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 657478] New: Invalid declare statement in macros.mingw32 with some packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Invalid declare statement in macros.mingw32 with some packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478 Summary: Invalid declare statement in macros.mingw32 with some packages Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-filesystem AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: waananen(a)nbi.dk QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rjones(a)redhat.com, kalev(a)smartlink.ee, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, drizt(a)land.ru Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I'm using a custom build of mingw32-python in order to build Python bindings for a software package. For this packages the code in macros.mingw32 breaks: ... for i in `ls %{_mingw32_bindir}/*|grep -- "-config\$"` ; do \ x=`basename $i|tr "a-z+-" "A-ZX_"`; \ declare -x $x="$i" ; export $x; \ done; \ ... The variable name $x contains a ('.') when it finds the python2.x-config script in %{_mingw32_bindir}. One could imagine that this problem could be triggered on other *-config scripts. The fix is easy: filter away dots ('.') from the filename when generating the variable name (eg. |cut -d '.'). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): I found this in Fedora 12, but it seems applicable to Fedora 14. How reproducible: Build a package which requires mingw32-python. The mingw32-python does not yet exist in Fedora (unfortunately). Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Package build fails Expected results: Package should build Additional info: Cheers Anders -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 10 months

1
21
0 / 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #3 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #2) > The new approved MinGW packaging guidelines can be found at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MinGWCrossCompiler > > Some initial review comments: > - Please change %?mingw_package_header to %{?mingw_package_header} Done. > - Please remove the use of the _cross_pkg_name global I changed this to _pkg_name to avoid confusion with the generic cross-compile system. > - Please add BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 and BuildRequires: > mingw64-filesystem >= 95 Done. > - Why are the binary packages named mingw32-clucene-core and > mingw-64-clucene-core instead of just mingw32-clucene and mingw64-clucene? This is in keeping with the standard Fedora packages which are named "clucene-core" and "clucene-contribs-lib". This package contains only the -core libraries and not the contribs. Just trying to maintain consistency with the native packages in Fedora. > - Please replace the %{description} tags with the complete description. Last > time I used this tag it didn't produce the expected result That's a shame. The %{description} usage was copied wholesale from the native spec file for the existing Fedora packages. > - Why is multithreading disabled? The package will not compile in 64-bit with threading enabled, and I ran into issues with the package's detection of the 32-bit pthread headers. It seems to be an upstream bug which I'd be happy to look into later, but for the time being it is (to me) less important than getting the library functioning properly. > - Why do you set the CFLAGS _CL_HAVE_WIN32_THREADS=0 ? Is support for win32 > threads disabled by this? I have found that setting this and the other multi-threading option are necessary to disable threading in a win32 build. > - Why is LUCENE_STATIC_CONSTANT_SYNTAX_EXITCODE set to 1 and the other > defines to 0? This is inherited from the original SuSE packages that I built my old Ubuntu mingw clucene package off of. I can only guess it is because this feature is supported whereas the others are not. CLucene's cross-platform detection does not seem to be as robust as it ought, so it needs a few of these options defined manually. Last time I tried building without this option the library did not build properly. > - The 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' can be removed from the %install section as > it's not needed any more Done > - The quotes used in %mingw_make call aren't needed any more and can be > removed Done > - The %defattr tags aren't needed any more with modern RPM and can also be > removed Done > > I'm not a Fedora sponsor, so I can't formally approve this package. > rwmjones: would you be interested in sponsoring Greg? Thanks for the review. I have uploaded an updated spec and src.rpm file to the same URLs as above if anyone else wants to take a look. rwmjones said on Freenode he is overburdened with sponsorees already. I'm still looking for a package sponsor for this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> --- The new approved MinGW packaging guidelines can be found at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MinGWCrossCompiler Some initial review comments: - Please change %?mingw_package_header to %{?mingw_package_header} - Please remove the use of the _cross_pkg_name global - Please add BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 and BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 - Why are the binary packages named mingw32-clucene-core and mingw-64-clucene-core instead of just mingw32-clucene and mingw64-clucene? - Please replace the %{description} tags with the complete description. Last time I used this tag it didn't produce the expected result - Why is multithreading disabled? - Why do you set the CFLAGS _CL_HAVE_WIN32_THREADS=0 ? Is support for win32 threads disabled by this? - Why is LUCENE_STATIC_CONSTANT_SYNTAX_EXITCODE set to 1 and the other defines to 0? - The 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' can be removed from the %install section as it's not needed any more - The quotes used in %mingw_make call aren't needed any more and can be removed - The %defattr tags aren't needed any more with modern RPM and can also be removed I'm not a Fedora sponsor, so I can't formally approve this package. rwmjones: would you be interested in sponsoring Greg? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-cximage-600-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-cximage-600-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-cximage-600-5.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). cfergeau not added, not a valid FAS account, please correct and add in pkgdb. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw May 2012