On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:42:59AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:52:02AM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:39:37AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 12:16:48AM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > > * mutt-kz package contains master + a few patches I took from local
> > > most-up-to-date version of mutt and will push them upstream eventually.
> > >
> > > * notmuch is some recent git version, 0.12-rc
> >
> > Hrm. I'm on Fedora 16 and the version of notmuch I'm seeing is
0.6.1-2.
> > It seems the more updated ABIs are available until Fedora 17 (0.11.1-1).
>
> The buildservice machinery is able to do cross-distro builds, I've
> enabled the Fedora targets, but there are a few expected problems
> (package naming) I need to fix. Then you could either use the built
> packages (unless you build them by other means from the spec files).
>
> There may be ABI problems as you note, but I think we should try to stay
> with something more recent than 0.6.
This is unnecessary, I have also Fedora 16 and:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mutt-kz/2012-February/000000.html
works for me. All you need is to install two packages from Fedora 17.
I don't like doing that; i.e., if I'm in F16 I shouldn't have to grab
packages from a different release. Otherwise I open myself up to having
problems if some other F16 package also depends on libnotmuch (as an
example).
It's always better to either fix it in one release or else not make it
available in that release. For me, I'm going to have to wait until F17
is released before I can actively contribute.
--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/