Hi,
This been said I conclude that the spin can only live in git or l10n, so
I'll end the pursuit for the full live image. But I'll continue the
documentation task on how to build a live localized iso. The
documentation will be available on our community site in an easy to
read/implement format for which we'll offer support.
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
Adrian
On 01/27/2010 06:34 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 04:31:04PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 27.01.2010, 17:01 +0200 schrieb Adrian:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The thing is that our users would feel in some way special when Fedora
>> will care sufficiently that it will build a dedicated spin for them.
>>
> Understood. But I think Kevin's question still stands: What is the
> benefit compared to the other spins and choosing the RO locale there?
>
> If there is anything that we can improve, we should improve it in all
> spins and not just a localized one that will target a limited user base.
>
I think Christoph is correct. I don't think there's much chance of
the Fedora Project Board approving a localized spin for the reasons
you guys have already stated. The
BrOffice.org spin was created to
allow distribution of Fedora while avoiding a specific trademark
problem in that region.
Because the Live spins tend to provide all the l10n bits, there's not
as much value in a spin that just happens to default to some other
language. I think it would be more valuable to look at how we might
better provide, and show the user at boot time how to get, a properly
localized environment no matter where they live.
One other minor point -- if we're hearing any sort of consistent
issues with producing a spin from a kickstart, such as being too hard,
then that process probably needs to be better documented.