On 05/06/2010 05:27 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:59:34PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 23:43:15 +0100,
> Peter Robinson<pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Slightly off topic for this list but a tool that ultimately the spins
>> depend strongly on. I'm wondering whether without a upstream
>> maintainer getting some of the patches (see links below) into upstream
>> tool might not be a possible project for FES?
>>
>> Getting some of these things fixed would be very useful for the Sugar
>> on a Stick spin, and slightly less so, but to the moblin and no doubt
>> other spins.
>
> Well it seems inefficient to put extra middle men in place when the FES
> people may not know stuff as well as the people submitting patches and
> may not have access to update the source either.
>
> I'd rather see the people willing to do the work (evidenced by submitting
> patches) just get the access needed to do the updates.
I agree with Bruno. The tool's upstream is in Fedora Hosted, correct?
All,
I am going to try and take a more active role with the livecd project.
Peter I have take your list and will try and work them into livecd-tools
upstream in the next couple of days.
For the rest of you, feel free to bug me if I miss something or
something has been sitting too long.
-D