On 15.06.2012 [12:51:16 -0500], Greg Swift wrote:
So since they both tested with success the patch and everything went
silent, I guess thats a yes?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:26 AM, James Cammarata <jimi(a)sngx.net> wrote:
>> Isn't that just duplicating the function of checking the 'static'
box?
>
> I'll defer to you guys, if that original suggested patch works I'll
> run with that.
Yeah, sorry, loaded with other work and forgot to reply. I have tested
the static patch and it worked fine in my environment.
Thanks,
Nish
--
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc(a)us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center