On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 23:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 03/30/2011 11:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:55 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
Please give specific examples that previously evaded the 'feature' process.
I have better things to do than spend my morning looking through old changelogs and freeze dates, thanks. Are you really suggesting it's never happened?
More importantly, the feature process has not been mandatory for major changes. So it is not a evasion.
Right, that's a better way of putting it. There's no need to get involved in a bunfight over specific examples - the point is that we have no explicit requirement that changes follow the feature process.