devel May 2015

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

194 participants
229 discussions

Outage Notification - 2009-07-01 01:00 UTC
by Mike McGrath 24 Aug '23

24 Aug '23

There will be an outage starting at 2009-07-01 01:00 UTC, which will last approximately 2 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2009-07-01 01:00 UTC' Affected Services: Buildsystem CVS / Source Control Unaffected Services: Database DNS Fedora Hosted Fedora People Fedora Talk Mail Mirror System Torrent Translation Services Websites Ticket Link: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1496 Reason for Outage: Final migration step for new cvs server. It will hopefully be offline for only 30-45 minutes. The additional time is for some further tuning if needed and some verification steps. Contact Information: Please join #fedora-admin in irc.freenode.net or respond to this email to track the status of this outage. _______________________________________________ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce

2 1

upgrading RH 9 system->Fedora with iso files and apt only
by Didier Casse 17 Jan '22

17 Jan '22

I have the yarrow's iso files on my HD in a RH9 system. Let's say I want to upgrade selected packages using an "apt-get install" pointing to my iso-mounted files, how do I do it? i.e I mount the iso into some /mnt/yarrow1, /mnt/yarrow 2 etc.. Then what is the complete procedure to make my apt look into my own HD to upgrade packages. Can anybody redirect me to the correct resource or some literature hanging on the web? Thanks. Assume also that I do not wish to burn CDs! I do not want to use apt-cdrom. Thanks. With kind regards, Didier. --- PhD student Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS) 5 Research Link, Singapore 117603 Email: slsbdfc at nus dot edu dot sg \or\ didierbe at sps dot nus dot edu dot sg Website: http://ssls.nus.edu.sg

6 9

pdftk retired?
by Michael J Gruber 08 Sep '21

08 Sep '21

I just git a "broken dependencies" notice for a package that I maintain. The reason is that "pdftk" got retired just the other day. I may have missed a corresponding post on fedora-devel, but I think a heads up notice to maintainers of depending packages may be in order before you retire a package, as a general idea. You see, unretiring a package is so much more work than changing maintainership. As for pdftk: I see 2 failed builds for version 1.45 and none for the current version 2.02 (which probably breaks the api anyways). What are the plans? Retire pdftk completely? Start fresh with pdftk2? pdflabs, the maker of pdftk, provide binary as well as source rpms for pdftk 2.02, by the way. I might even look into packaging it but don't want to duplicate any existing efforts. Michael

17 26

git push permission denied
by Neal Becker 10 Feb '21

10 Feb '21

I just had to setup a new machine, and new ssh keys. I visited https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/xxxx I chose my new id_rsa.pub to upload. But I get: git push --verbose Pushing to ssh://nbecker@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/mercurial Permission denied (publickey). fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Hints?

4 5

apitrace, bundled libbacktrace
by Sandro Mani 17 Dec '17

17 Dec '17

Hi, apitrace 5.0 bundles libbacktrace, which looks like is living within the gcc sources. libbacktrace is not build as a shared library from the gcc sources, and not packaged. Is it feasible to build libbacktrace as a shared library and ship it in a corresponding package? Or should I rather go for a bundling exception request? Thanks, Sandro

8 9

whatever happened to yum + btrfs snapshotting?
by Neal Becker 13 Mar '17

13 Mar '17

Some time back there was discussion of being able to rollback yum updates via btrfs snapshotting. As I recall, it turned out that the default btrfs install was not setup correctly to make this feasible (I had briefly tested it on my machine). I haven't heard anything since - this seems like a great idea. -- -- Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it

7 7

Bad default error policy causes printing issues and BIG usability issues
by Valent Turkovic 31 Aug '15

31 Aug '15

Hi, currently default error policy for printers in Fedora is "Stop printer" on any error which is a really bad default. I have run across this issue LOTS of times with regular Fedora desktop users who don't get why has their printer stopped working, there is no UI queue to warn users, there is no easy way to "Start printer" with one click after it has been stopped. It is just a big mess. Even worse, previous versions of Gnome control panel (if I remember correctly) had option to change default error policy, now that option is removed and you can get to it only by installing system-config-printers tool, something regular users have no idea about even exists, and it is not installed by default. There are too many examples which are simple user errors but result in priner going offline (stopped) and this is really bad, because after any small error users can't print any more. For example: user trying to print while he/she is not at home so his/hers printer is not available, user trying to print but has forgot to connect usb priner cable, user trying to print but haven't turned it on, user printing to wifi printer but while connected to different wifi network... Any of these actions is simple uses error but results in permanently disabling of priner (Stops printer) and users can't print even when they resolve issue that was stopping them from accessing the printer. Now Fedora is what is stopping them from printing. Who is responsible for user experience of Fedora desktop? To whom should I point this issue to?

4 5

Firefox addon signing
by Michael Cronenworth 30 Aug '15

30 Aug '15

I'm sure those that need to know, know, but for those that haven't heard[1] Mozilla's official Firefox build will enforce addons to contain a Mozilla signature without any runtime option to disable the check. Initially this prevents Fedora packaged addons since they are unsigned. The Mozilla signing process takes time and can't be part of a package building process. Is Fedora going to get authorization to build Firefox with a runtime disable option? [1] https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/02/10/extension-signing-safer-experien…

25 48

updating f22 llvm to 3.5.2 release?
by Jens-Ulrik Petersen 21 Jul '15

21 Jul '15

Hi, I opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221923 about this too but thought it would be good to ask here. F22 currently has llvm-3.5.0 (F23 is now on 3.6.0): I believe there is a newer 3.5.2 bugfix release - would it make sense to make a F22 update for that? Is there any expected risk with doing that? Anyway for F23 I probably have to make a llvm35 package again for building ghc-7.10 on armv7 (and ideally aarch64). 3.5.0 has a critical bug that breaks ghc, so it would be based on 3.5.2 anyway. Jens

3 2

Non-responsive Maintainer - itamarjp
by Eric Christensen 19 Jul '15

19 Jul '15

Does anyone know how to contact itamarjp? I've been trying to contact him through BZ[0] regarding a security flaw in ytnef that's been open for going on five years. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632537 Thanks. --Eric

4 4

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel May 2015