On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:25:22PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
So the request is for there to be a way to indicate that a stream is available for explicit dependencies, but *shouldn't* be taken into account for implicit stream expansion yet. Then, once the low level stream is stable, *then* its maintainers can flick the switch to say "OK, this looks healthy, start building new variants of all the modules that depend on this one".
Okay, I get it now. :) I still think the Service Level field would be useful here; maybe by policy dependent modules wouldn't be auto-expanded against streams tagged as "alpha".