February 2018 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Athmane Madjoudj

Hello, I'm planing to orphan ncftp, since the new version did not include IPv6 support (patch from OpenBSD) [1], plus I'm not using it anymore. NB. scripts using ncftp for mirroring can be switched to lftp, which includes similar features and more. Best regards. [1] http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/Update-net-ncftp-3-2-6-drop-IPv...

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

Outdated rawhide packages

by Xose Vazquez Perez

Hi, procps-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1251736 flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1389575 coffee-script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1405120 mercurial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150491 iptables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1417323 Thank you.

6 years, 2 months

1
1
0 / 0

Fedora 28 Mass Branching

by Mohan Boddu

Hi All, Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder rawhide/f29 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so this means that anything you do for f28 you also have to do in the master branch and do a build there. There will be a Fedora 28 compose ASAP and it'll appear http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/28/ once complete. Please be sure to check it out. Bodhi is currently not active for Fedora 28, it will be enabled in a weeks time when we hit Beta change freeze point in the Fedora 28 schedule[1]. Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Schedule _______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org

6 years, 2 months

5
8
0 / 0

BSD 2-Clause license

by Fernando Nasser

Hi, Would it be possible to add: BSD 2-clause to our table of valid licenses? It is already in https://spdx.org/licenses/ BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License <https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause.html> |BSD-2-Clause| and is OSI-approved. For reference: https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause.html#licenseText Thanks in advance! P.S.: It is used by something called 'fluentd'.

6 years, 2 months

2
2
0 / 0

orphaned ath_info

by Michal Schmidt

Hello, I orphaned ath_info, a tool to read and write EEPROM on Atheros wireless cards. It only worked with ath5k cards, which I no longer have. Michal

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

Orphaning procedure for mMass

by Antonio Trande

Hello everyone. This is part of the "orphaning" procedure of mMass according to guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers... mMass development has been officially ended. There will be no further updates, bug fixes or support from upstream, so its rpms will not longer maintained. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.

by Martin Gansser

i get this message from limb in the pagure ticket [1] The Bugzilla review bug creator could not be found in FAS. Make sure your FAS email address is the same as in Bugzilla. I am not aware that the email addresses are different. [1] pagure ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4602 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

6 years, 2 months

2
8
0 / 0

F28 System Wide Change: GCC8

by Jan Kurik

= System Wide Change: GCC8 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC8 Change owner(s): * Jakub Jelínek <jakub AT redhat DOT com> Switch GCC in Fedora 28 to 8.x.y, rebuild all packages with it, or optionally rebuild just some packages with it and rebuild all packages only in Fedora 29. == Detailed Description == GCC 8 is currently in stage3, will move to stage4 on January 14th, in prerelease state with only regression bugfixes and documentation fixes allowed. The release will happen probably in the middle of April. We are working on scratch gcc rpms and will perform a test mass rebuild. == Scope == All packages should be rebuilt with the new gcc once it hits f28, or, if there is not enough time for that, just all packages built after the new gcc hits the buildroots. * Proposal owners: Build gcc in f28, rebuild packages that have direct dependencies on exact gcc version (libtool, llvm, gcc-python-plugin, odb). * Other developers: First few days/weeks just voluntary rebuilds using the new system gcc, if things fail, look at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/porting_to.html and fix bugs in packages or, if there is a gcc bug or suspected gcc bug, analyze and report. * Release engineering: PR#7249: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7249 Mass rebuild requested for F28. * Policies and guidelines: No policies need to be changed -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic

6 years, 2 months

8
12
0 / 0

[HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot

by Igor Gnatenko

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hey, today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm- sign-libs. This resulted into 8 packages disappearing from buildroot¹². This should not be a problem, but still useful to know. ⁰ https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm/c/99d6687a36647cb307b789d19921a341... c671 ¹ gnupg2, gnutls, ima-evm-utils, libassuan, libksba, libusbx, nettle, npth ² 171 → 163 packages - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqMHnsACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0wmUhAAtx5N4EQ+ulMHDkWyi1p96RGojp0H0xMudlai54sJOU/0FvNe8y0e0o6H ZERhdDKDgl7KtNEhSS/KsL+8Siog2PCSDv3SbwGrfeqegCRz/qOq4gqPsdLdkgCu dNtUNpvVIBwrTcNSU7igVnlnz5b9Su3TcCBunca3vCEEU5MKtEWQTYqFIjxOAjBX NGkuvmoY3hj07IP9Vh0q0VNyHCBfsXmVHruN9b8VFZx9IcEJ2OguQ6cFVzoeyeeI p4dlKza3znXeS53GtDA7WMGBEl/EI8Czh2/5JXgBZrshshfCY84pa2kZo0igC/3m lAbTCvGtqt8V4HW2RPttQsEtvTrRseuXWRXvNIcrXXiTaB6XyRaf58tY3jWerK5k 3KlDyMSNvD6neSrk7ujykX5Wh4qQAvmvSrjEeYAPpwIoBh1uAH1yKQJ1THPSxwff 9u/kU7bnGfJOIMAi0AQR3jNBxFVWZzEZisA/k6M5RwKLdb+Lvcxpz39wTSzqd0SE 0dMP5VWZ50P9JGh+xmWPtYWId7qzbYsXxzLBTwtbDZNfoUGxawF8jsxLN35tsgw9 Mojw9R34uq1ytPYcg6tIX2tryDW2oBm9AhKPC6+WKCjJeQIZze1YzL+cdFsd0aba 9+smUVTWBRaXI6CL9luXkjSG4jzu7C2Fb7Fvb4/PZ0bM0ZtNhUk= =wlgf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org

6 years, 2 months

4
8
0 / 0

Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

by Dennis Gilmore

Hi All, We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild, The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3] and the full list of packages that are needing rebuilding can be found here[4]. The needs rebuild list includes packages that failed to get submitted to koji for various reasons, things like the spec bumping failing due to incomplete or incorrect retirement Please quickly clean up all build failures as the schedule[5] has us branching next Tuesday, on the 20th of February and enabling Bodhi on the 6th of March, So expect to see a 28 branched compose in about a week from now. Many Thanks Dennis [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild [2] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f28-failures.html [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f28-need-rebuild.ht ml [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Schedule _______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org

6 years, 2 months

20
27
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel February 2018