devel August 2018

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

200 participants
270 discussions

Unannounced SONAME bump for libssh
by Michael Cronenworth 17 Aug '18

17 Aug '18

The libssh package uses wildcards on SONAME version. The package was upgraded from 0.7.5 to 0.8.1 in Fedora 27+ that included a SONAME bump. Please remove the wildcard in libssh and begin package rebuilds. Stable versions of Fedora now contain broken software as the package has been released to stable. Thanks, Michael

4 4

Orphaned rocksdb
by Matej Mužila 17 Aug '18

17 Aug '18

Hi, I've orphaned the rocksdb package. Nothing depends on it and it seems that it is not needed in Fedora. Matej

3 3

Mock build for rawhide is broken
by Vascom 17 Aug '18

17 Aug '18

Hi. I can't buld or even init mock for fedora-rawhide-x86_64 because wrong GPG key for fc29 packages still present in rawhide. For example: Public key for shadow-utils-4.6-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: shadow-utils-2:4.6-2.fc29.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-30-primary Please correct it. -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov

2 1

[HEADS UP] Update libgit2 to 0.27
by Igor Gnatenko 17 Aug '18

17 Aug '18

Hello everyone, 0.27.x is released long time ago, but I never got time for updating it. It obviously involves SONAME change. The good thing about this release is that it breaks only things in runtime and only one function changed signature (for building) which nobody uses anyway. I'm going to update library as soon as I get time (possibly on this weekend if no all dependent packages build fine). I will handle all rebuilds myself, just sending a notice. List of affected packages is below. Maintainers by package: R-git2r qulogic geany-plugins dmaphy ohaessler pingou ghc-bdcs-api clumens ghc-gi-ggit dshea git-evtag ignatenkobrain walters gitg ankursinha ignatenkobrain nacho pwalter julia nalimilan kf5-ktexteditor dvratil jgrulich rdieter than libgit2-glib ignatenkobrain kalev nacho pwalter python-pygit2 pwalter rubygem-rugged ignatenkobrain ktdreyer tdawson rust-exa ignatenkobrain rust-pretty-git-prompt ignatenkobrain ttomecek subsurface pingou Packages by maintainer: ankursinha gitg clumens ghc-bdcs-api dmaphy geany-plugins dshea ghc-gi-ggit dvratil kf5-ktexteditor ignatenkobrain git-evtag gitg libgit2-glib rubygem-rugged rust-exa rust-pretty-git-prompt jgrulich kf5-ktexteditor kalev libgit2-glib ktdreyer rubygem-rugged nacho gitg libgit2-glib nalimilan julia ohaessler geany-plugins pingou geany-plugins subsurface pwalter gitg libgit2-glib python-pygit2 qulogic R-git2r rdieter kf5-ktexteditor tdawson rubygem-rugged than kf5-ktexteditor ttomecek rust-pretty-git-prompt walters git-evtag -- -Igor Gnatenko

4 4

Re: fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?
by Alec Leamas 17 Aug '18

17 Aug '18

On 16/08/18 14:54, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Thanks for your help! You are listed as the main admin for the > fedora-review project on pagure [0] - can you give me (decathorpe), > Miro (churchyard), and Neal (ngompa) access to the project? > Done. Welcome tto the project, you are all admins! There is a fedora-review mailing list which might be useful. Cheers! --alec

2 1

Nonresponsive maintainer: Luke Macken (lmacken)
by Miro Hrončok 16 Aug '18

16 Aug '18

Luke Macken (lmacken) is not responsive. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610474 Anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

3 3

fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?
by Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 16 Aug '18

16 Aug '18

f-r currently fails to build (#1603956), it has a bunch of bugs open [1] and many issues and unhandled pull requests in the upstream repo [2, 3]. The last upstream commit was 2 years ago. f-r has is annoyingly outdated and gives often outright bad advice (for example about BR:gcc or BR:g++). The situation would be significantly improved if the outstanding PRs were merged. f-r is also python2-only now, which will be a problem soon since support for python2 is waning [4]. Is there any hope of upstream and downstream activity on f-r? [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&component=fedora-rev… [2] https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/issues [3] https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-requests [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal

7 8

how to track downstream these days
by Julian Sikorski 16 Aug '18

16 Aug '18

Hi list, how does one track downstream packages these days? The instructions on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tracking_downstream_packages do not seem to work anymore, and neither does their dnf flavour: $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires `sudo dnf repoquery --provides zlib` Ostatnio sprawdzono ważność metadanych: 0:21:41 temu w dniu pon, 13 sie 2018, 20:13:27. Ostatnio sprawdzono ważność metadanych: 0:21:42 temu w dniu pon, 13 sie 2018, 20:13:27. $ sudo dnf repoquery --provides zlib Ostatnio sprawdzono ważność metadanych: 0:22:05 temu w dniu pon, 13 sie 2018, 20:13:27. libz.so.1 libz.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0.2) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0.2)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0.8) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0.8)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.2) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.2)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.2.3) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.2.3)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.2.4) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.2.4)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.3.3) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.3.3)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.3.4) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.3.4)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.3.5) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.3.5)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.5.1) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.5.1)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.5.2) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.5.2)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.7.1) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.7.1)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.9) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.9)(64bit) zlib = 1.2.11-7.fc28 zlib = 1.2.11-8.fc28 zlib(x86-32) = 1.2.11-7.fc28 zlib(x86-32) = 1.2.11-8.fc28 zlib(x86-64) = 1.2.11-7.fc28 zlib(x86-64) = 1.2.11-8.fc28 $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires libz.so.1 Ostatnio sprawdzono ważność metadanych: 0:22:34 temu w dniu pon, 13 sie 2018, 20:13:27. CBFlib-0:0.9.5.15-6.fc28.i686 CGAL-0:4.11.1-1.fc28.i686 ClanLib-0:2.3.7-14.fc28.i686 ClanLib06-0:0.6.5-42.fc28.i686 ClanLib1-0:1.0.0-25.fc27.i686 Coin2-0:2.5.0-33.fc28.i686 Coin3-0:3.1.3-22.fc28.i686 DevIL-0:1.7.8-28.fc28.i686 DevIL-ILUT-0:1.7.8-28.fc28.i686 EMBOSS-libs-0:6.6.0-10.fc28.i686 .... So it appears there is an issue with piping the output of the first dnf call to the second. Best regards, Julian

3 3

About to orphan python-pymtp
by Ville-Pekka Vainio 16 Aug '18

16 Aug '18

Hi! In light of the recent FTBFS reports, I would like to orphan python-pymtp, because I haven't used it in a while. There's one other maintainer called "snirkel", sending this email to them as well. Anyone interested in maintaining this package? Ville-Pekka Vainio

2 2

Fedora updates-20180815.1 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 16 Aug '18

16 Aug '18

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

3 2

← Newer
1
...
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
27
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel August 2018