September 2018 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

Disabling build options for SSE on non-capable arches ?

by David Timms

Hi, (this is a 4th retry, now trying devel as first try to packaging a week ago says held by moderator, but doesn't seem to have been posted to the list, and I don't know why...) Audacity has had the following as part of rpm spec in the %configure section: %configure \ --disable-dynamic-loading \ ... %ifnarch %{ix86} x86_64 --disable-sse \ %else %{nil} %endif Which fails on: non x86 arches: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29513664 If I remove the conditional, I get successful build, but not optimized on x86 with SSE. What's wrong with this conditional ? Cheers, David

5 years, 8 months

3
3
0 / 0

Intent to orphan coan

by Jonathan Underwood

Hi, I am planning to orphan the coan package in a week or so unless someone else is interested in taking on the package. "Coan is a software engineering tool for analysing preprocessor-based configurations of C or C++ source code. Its principal use is to simplify a body of source code by eliminating any parts that are redundant with respect to a specified configuration. Dead code removal is an application of this sort." (from the project website). Coan is somewhat dead upstream. I have just finished some housekeeping on the package - making it build again on Fedora 29+ (with the dropping of /usr/bin/python from the python2 package), and added a patch that was causing crashes on Fedora 28+. The software could do with some attention to fix these issues: 1) At present the test suite fails on arm and ppc64le 2) Various C++11 deprecation warnings are present during the building I don't have the time to continue maintaining this package, unfortunately. Please get in touch if you want to maintain the package and I'll hand it over to you. Cheers, Jonathan

5 years, 8 months

2
2
0 / 0

Fedora 29 Beta 1.5 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 283213 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283213 ID: 283219 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283219 ID: 283307 Test: i386 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283307 ID: 283323 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283323 Soft failed openQA tests: 4/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 283181 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283181 ID: 283182 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283182 ID: 283188 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283188 ID: 283206 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283206 ID: 283210 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283210 ID: 283260 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283260 Passed openQA tests: 126/132 (x86_64), 21/24 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 158 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

5 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.5 Available Now!

by rawhide＠fedoraproject.org

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.5 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/29 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Security_Lab All Beta priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-29/f-29-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Beta_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/ _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedorap...

5 years, 8 months

2
1
0 / 0

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-09-20 16:00 UTC)

by James Antill

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2018-09-20 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): ================= Day: Thursday ================== 2018-09-20 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2018-09-20 12:00 EDT --> US/Eastern <-- 2018-09-20 16:00 UTC UTC 2018-09-20 17:00 BST Europe/London 2018-09-20 18:00 CEST Europe/Berlin 2018-09-20 18:00 CEST Europe/Paris 2018-09-20 21:30 IST Asia/Calcutta ---------------- New Day: Friday ----------------- 2018-09-21 00:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong 2018-09-21 00:00 +08 Asia/Singapore 2018-09-21 01:00 JST Asia/Tokyo 2018-09-21 02:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting = Followups = #topic #665 SSLCertificateHandling policy update .fpc 665 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/665 #topic #667 Recommend use of systemd sandboxing directives .fpc 667 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/667 #topic #693 Wiki:Packaging:RPMMacros .fpc 693 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/693 #topic #703 Inconsistency between "General Naming" and "Case Sensitivity" .fpc 703 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/703 #topic #719 Simplify packaging of forge-hosted projects .fpc 719 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/719 #topic #726 Review for SELinux Independent Policy packaging Draft .fpc 726 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/726 #topic #727 convert guidelines to git and restructured text .fpc 727 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/727 #topic #743 Add link to C/C++ build flag docs. in redhat-rpm-config .fpc 743 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/743 #topic #775 Allow to have %{?suse_version} condition in spec file .fpc 775 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/775 #topic #784 forbid globs for shared libraries as it conceals sonames .fpc 784 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/784 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can: * Reply to this e-mail * File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee * E-mail me directly * Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

5 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora 29 Beta status: RC5 incoming, purpose

by Adam Williamson

Hi, folks! So, Beta RC4 is out there and being tested (thanks for all the testing so far). There is an RC5 coming too: here's why. We haven't found any blockers in RC4 yet, but we did find several not- quite-blockers that seemed bad. First of all, the Silverblue (formerly known as Atomic Workstation) installer image build failed due to a network blip, so RC4 does not have that image. If we ship RC4 as the Beta, we wouldn't have a Silverblue installer for the Beta at all (unless we did some ugly hack to stuff some other image in), and that seems bad - the image isn't release-blocking, but it is a major area of development and we really ought to include it in Beta. Beyond that, we happened to run into and find fixes for quite a slew of bugs in gnome-shell, plus a couple in gtk+ and mesa that are quite visible too. Here's a list of all the bugs in question: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630134 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/574 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/539 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/227 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/523 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631068 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628462 So nirik, mboddu and I agreed it'd be reasonable to run a Beta RC5 to give us at least the option of shipping a compose with the Silverblue image and fixes for all those bugs, if everything goes well. As there aren't any outright blockers in it, Beta RC4 is still a candidate for release too. Beta RC5 should complete in ten hours or so. There should be no difference between Beta RC4 and Beta RC5 outside of GNOME and the mesa fix, so most RC4 tests should be valid for RC5 too. So, please continue testing RC4. Once RC5 arrives, go ahead and test that too, prioritizing smoke tests, tests of GNOME, and any Basic / Beta tests not yet run against RC4. It is not a high priority to run tests on RC5 that have already been run on RC4, unless they're basic smoke tests or GNOME tests. Thanks a lot, everyone! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

5 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora 29 Beta 1.4 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 282811 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282811 ID: 282821 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282821 ID: 282827 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282827 ID: 282830 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282830 ID: 282833 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282833 ID: 282854 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282854 ID: 282920 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282920 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 282795 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282795 ID: 282796 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282796 ID: 282820 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282820 ID: 282874 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282874 Passed openQA tests: 125/132 (x86_64), 21/24 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 158 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

5 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora 29 Beta Go/No-Go meeting

by Ben Cotton

Dear all, The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Beta release will be held on Thursday, 2018-09-13 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting View the meeting on Fedocal at https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2018/9/10/#m9338 -- Ben Cotton Fedora Program Manager TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis

5 years, 8 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.4 Available Now!

by rawhide＠fedoraproject.org

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.4 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/29 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Security_Lab All Beta priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-29/f-29-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Beta_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/ _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedorap...

5 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

koji download-build fails with [ERROR] koji: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied

by Richard W.M. Jones

I don't know if this is a problem with this specific version of koji, or our Koji builders, but: $ koji download-build nbdkit-1.7.3-1.fc30 --arch=x86_64 --arch=noarch Downloading: nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm 2018-09-19 10:14:21,056 [ERROR] koji: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: 'nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm' $ rpm -q koji koji-1.16.0-1.fc29.noarch This happens with other fc30 builds I have tried to download too. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW

5 years, 8 months

3
3
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel September 2018