Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 05th October
by Purusharth Saxena
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting next week on
*Monday 05th October at 1300UTC* in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode). The
meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend.
https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-neuro
The channel is bridged to Telegram, so you can also join us there on the
@NeuroFedora group:
https://t.me/NeuroFedora
You can convert the meeting time to your local time using this command
in a terminal:
$ date --date='TZ="UTC" 1300 next Mon'
or you can use this link:
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=NeuroFedora+Mee...
The meeting will be chaired by @purusharths. The agenda for the meeting
is:
- New introductions and roll call.
- Tasks from last week's meeting:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2020-09-21/neurofedora.202...
- Open Pagure tickets:
https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issues?status=Open&tags=S%3A+...
- Open bugs check: https://tinyurl.com/neurofedora-bugs
- CompNeuro lab compose a status check for F33/F34.
- Neuroscience query of the week.
- Next meeting day, and chair.
- Open floor.
We hope to see you there!
You can learn more about NeuroFedora here:
https://neuro.fedoraproject.org
--
Thanks & Regards,
Purusharth S (He / Him / His)
Time zone: Asia/Kolkata
3 years, 6 months
- 1
- 1
Discussion: unixODBC - move unversioned *.so files back to
unixODBC-devel package
by Ondrej Dubaj
Hello everyone,
I would like to start a discussion about moving unversioned *.so files back
to unixODBC-devel package, as they are currently in the main package. The
reason for this discussion is primary have things in order according to
future rhel-9.
There will potentially be a change of moving 5 files {libodbc.so
libodbcinst.so libodbcpsqlS.so libodbcmyS.so libtdsS.so} to devel package,
so from the maintainers/users perspective, dependent packages will have to
require also the devel package and should be rebuild as well. No other
changes will be made.
There seemed to be no big reason for moving the libraries to the main
package in the past, so I consider f34 as a good candidate for such a
change. It would be great, if you share your opinions and concerns for
this topic.
Sharing also the official documentation [1], tracker in bugzilla [2] and
upcoming changes in unixODBC package [3]
Thanks!
Ondrej
[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877720
[3]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/odubaj/rpms/unixODBC/c/7ecddca7cfcc4e0...
3 years, 6 months
- 7
- 13
Fedora-Cloud-32-20201001.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200930.0):
ID: 682197 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/682197
Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
3 years, 6 months
- 1
- 0