February 2020 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

Any issues booting Rawhide kernel-5.6.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc32.x86_64?

by Richard W.M. Jones

I tried out this kernel: - kernel-5.6.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc32.x86_64 It gets to grub, lets you select the kernel, but apparently no further. It's kind of frustrating to debug because either it produces *no* messages at all even in verbose mode, or else it's screwing up the display somehow so that nothing can be seen. I moved back to kernel-5.5.0-0.rc6.git2.1.fc32.x86_64 which boots fine, so I don't think it's a UEFI or grub issue. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW

4 years, 4 months

4
5
0 / 0

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

by Miro Hrončok

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will be retired when the affected package gets retired. Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/<pkgname> Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2020-02-10.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. Package (co)maintainers Status Change ================================================================================ argyllcms orphan, rhughes 2 weeks ago clang7.0 orphan, sergesanspaille, 0 weeks ago tstellar exciting marcindulak, orphan 3 weeks ago felix-scr-maven-plugin jerboaa, jkang, orphan 0 weeks ago hibernate lef, odubaj, orphan 1 weeks ago htmlcleaner besser82, marcindulak, orphan 3 weeks ago ini4j orphan 0 weeks ago java-augeas bkearney, orphan 2 weeks ago jboss-transaction-1.2-api orphan 4 weeks ago jettison mizdebsk, orphan 4 weeks ago jetty-artifact-remote-resources mizdebsk, orphan 4 weeks ago jetty-assembly-descriptors mizdebsk, orphan 4 weeks ago jetty-test-policy mizdebsk, orphan 4 weeks ago llvm7.0 jistone, orphan, 0 weeks ago sergesanspaille, tstellar maven-jarsigner-plugin jcapik, mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago maven-shared-jarsigner mizdebsk, orphan 2 weeks ago python-bz2file besser82, orphan 0 weeks ago rubygem-pam bkearney, orphan 2 weeks ago slack-cleaner orphan 4 weeks ago sugar-moon bkearney, orphan 2 weeks ago sugar-turtleart bkearney, erikos, orphan, sdz 2 weeks ago swingx orphan 5 weeks ago The following packages require above mentioned packages: Depending on: argyllcms (1), status change: 2020-01-22 (2 weeks ago) foo2zjs (maintained by: cjatherton) foo2zjs-0.20170412-13.fc32.x86_64 requires argyllcms = 1.9.2-8.fc31 Depending on: llvm7.0 (1), status change: 2020-02-06 (0 weeks ago) clang7.0 (maintained by: orphan, sergesanspaille, tstellar) clang7.0-7.0.1-10.fc31.1.src requires llvm7.0-devel = 7.0.1-4.fc32.2, llvm7.0-static = 7.0.1-4.fc32.2 clang7.0-libs-7.0.1-10.fc31.1.i686 requires libLLVM-7.so, libLLVM-7.so(LLVM_7) clang7.0-libs-7.0.1-10.fc31.1.x86_64 requires libLLVM-7.so()(64bit), libLLVM-7.so(LLVM_7)(64bit) Depending on: maven-jarsigner-plugin (1), status change: 2020-01-26 (2 weeks ago) jetty-test-policy (maintained by: mizdebsk, orphan) jetty-test-policy-1.2-23.fc32.src requires mvn(org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jarsigner-plugin) = 1.4 Depending on: maven-shared-jarsigner (2), status change: 2020-01-26 (2 weeks ago) maven-jarsigner-plugin (maintained by: jcapik, mizdebsk, orphan) maven-jarsigner-plugin-1.4-10.fc32.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.maven.shared:maven-jarsigner) = 1.3.2 maven-jarsigner-plugin-1.4-10.fc32.src requires mvn(org.apache.maven.shared:maven-jarsigner) = 1.3.2 jetty-test-policy (maintained by: mizdebsk, orphan) jetty-test-policy-1.2-23.fc32.src requires mvn(org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jarsigner-plugin) = 1.4 Affected (co)maintainers besser82: python-bz2file, htmlcleaner bkearney: rubygem-pam, java-augeas, sugar-moon, sugar-turtleart cjatherton: argyllcms erikos: sugar-turtleart jcapik: maven-shared-jarsigner, maven-jarsigner-plugin jerboaa: felix-scr-maven-plugin jistone: llvm7.0 jkang: felix-scr-maven-plugin lef: hibernate marcindulak: exciting, htmlcleaner mizdebsk: maven-shared-jarsigner, jettison, jetty-artifact-remote-resources, jetty-test-policy, jetty-assembly-descriptors, maven-jarsigner-plugin odubaj: hibernate rhughes: argyllcms sdz: sugar-turtleart sergesanspaille: llvm7.0, clang7.0 tstellar: llvm7.0, clang7.0 -- The script creating this output is run and developed by Fedora Release Engineering. Please report issues at its pagure instance: https://pagure.io/releng/ The sources of this script can be found at: https://pagure.io/releng/blob/master/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py

4 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

g++ 10: static declared in extern "C" inline function

by Iñaki Ucar

Hi, I've stumbled upon a regression, and I'm not sure this is a gcc 10 bug or not. Consider the sample program in [1], a simplification of a real case out there [2]. It fails to compile in Fedora Rawhide with the following message: /tmp/cccbVeNV.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cccbVeNV.s:59: Error: symbol `f' is already defined The example defines two static local pointers to a callback under the same name in two different inline functions that are not static. I'm not sure whether this is entirely correct, given that the C version (removing the extern "C" declaration) throws a warning, but still, previous versions of g++ produce prefixed static symbols that don't collide, and the compilation succeeds. Thoughts? [1] https://gist.github.com/kevinushey/cfa848be2d39ddd110f893d9b6c5ac9c [2] https://github.com/RcppCore/RcppEigen/blob/master/inst/include/RcppEigenS... -- Iñaki Úcar

4 years, 4 months

2
4
0 / 0

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200210.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

4 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

HEADS UP: python-cffi 1.14.0 in rawhide, possibly Fedora 31

by Miro Hrončok

Hello. There is updated python-cffi 1.14.0 in rawhide, updated from 1.13.2. With a possible update in Fedora 31 from 1.12.3. https://cffi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/whatsnew.html There should be no backward incompatible changes apart from a new deprecation in 1.13.1. (If your package was not affected by this already in rawhide and your Fedora 31 version is the same, you shouldn't get affected by it.) It would be appreciated if you could please check if all your dependent packages build and work fine, and report back trough Bugzilla or here. Thanks Maintainers by package: freecell-solver shlomif freeipa abbra fcami ipa-maint jhrozek mkosek pvoborni rcritten simo twoerner libolm xvitaly ocrmypdf qulogic printrun churchyard python-argon2-cffi atim paulcarroty python-autobahn jujens python-bcrypt pingou williamjmorenor python-cairocffi brouhaha fschwarz jdulaney python-cryptography ayrx bowlofeggs cheimes itamarjp jcline noodles npmccallum python-lmdb pspacek python-nnpy tdawson python-persistent jjames python-pillow miminar smani python-pycares fantom python-pygit2 pwalter python-pynacl ignatenkobrain python-snappy jujens python-xcffib cicku jdulaney qtile cicku jdulaney rpy alexlan jamatos weasyprint brouhaha fschwarz Packages by maintainer: abbra freeipa alexlan rpy atim python-argon2-cffi ayrx python-cryptography bowlofeggs python-cryptography brouhaha python-cairocffi weasyprint cheimes python-cryptography churchyard printrun cicku python-xcffib qtile fantom python-pycares fcami freeipa fschwarz python-cairocffi weasyprint ignatenkobrain python-pynacl ipa-maint freeipa itamarjp python-cryptography jamatos rpy jcline python-cryptography jdulaney python-cairocffi python-xcffib qtile jhrozek freeipa jjames python-persistent jujens python-autobahn python-snappy miminar python-pillow mkosek freeipa noodles python-cryptography npmccallum python-cryptography paulcarroty python-argon2-cffi pingou python-bcrypt pspacek python-lmdb pvoborni freeipa pwalter python-pygit2 qulogic ocrmypdf rcritten freeipa shlomif freecell-solver simo freeipa smani python-pillow tdawson python-nnpy twoerner freeipa williamjmorenor python-bcrypt xvitaly libolm -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

4 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

can't build speed-dreams for rawhide

by Martin Gansser

Hi, i get this error in the build.log [1] of speed-dreams: DEBUG util.py:596: No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk DEBUG util.py:596: Error: DEBUG util.py:596: Problem: conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:596: - nothing provides pkgconfig(qhull) needed by FreeSOLID-devel-2.1.1-35.fc32.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:598: (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4758/41444758/root.log How can i solve this problem ? Regards Martin

4 years, 4 months

2
2
0 / 0

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200210.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

4 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2020-02-10 Fedora QA Meeting

by Adam Williamson

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for tomorrow. We met the last few weeks and I don't think we have any urgent business this week. There will be a blocker review meeting. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedorap...

4 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Test-Announce] 2020-02-10 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 32 Blocker Review Meeting

by Adam Williamson

# F32 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2020-02-10 # Time: 17:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 1 proposed Beta blocker and 2 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a Fedora 32 blocker review meeting tomorrow! If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ . We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F32 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Have a good evening and see you tomorrow! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedorap...

4 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Policy for non-responsive reviewers

by Elliott Sales de Andrade

Hello, I've been waiting almost 2 months for my reviewer to respond on my package request. I pinged and set needinfo some time ago, but still nothing. My package is FTBFS and FTI in F31, and I've been stuck because of this. Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package review process [2] which mentions several items about non-responsive *submitters*, but nothing about reviewers. There's also some mention of legal blockers, but not how to ping for clarification there. Neither the Join page [3] nor the review guidelines [4] mention anything about timelines. Now I know there's no _technical_ reason why I can't un-assign a bug, but I'd rather discuss policy here. * Who should be pinged, needinfo'd, or otherwise contacted, and after how long? * If there's a legal question, who should be pinged and when? * At what point does a packager give up and ask for another reviewer (by setting back to NEW)? [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_packa... [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers [4] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/ -- Elliott

4 years, 4 months

4
4
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel February 2020