December 2021 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Barry Scott

I see that there are packages for qt6, but no python-qt6 yet. What is the plan for this please? I have built PyQt5 in the past and, time permitting, can offer help. Barry

2 years, 4 months

3
2
0 / 0

I quit packaging

by Volker Fröhlich

I don't want to be a package maintainer anymore. All of my packages are up for grabs. Volker (FAS volter)

2 years, 4 months

10
16
0 / 0

(Not) Bundling Javascript for a Python package?

by Viliam Križan

Hello, I have this python-djangoql [1] package that I've maintain. The upstream has decided to split the JavaScript code to a separate repository [2] available also on NPM as djangoql-completion [3]. However they bundle the JS in their Python package [4] as a minified JS file. According to JavaScript guidelines [5] the minified code has to be minified in the RPM build process. That would mean to split it to a separate package (js-djangoql-completion), remove the pre-minified files at %prep, use Requires and symlink it... So far it is straight-forward, but what to do with the NPM dependencies of that package (lex and lodash)? Can those be pulled just for the build process and bundled [6] (compiled into minified file)? There aren't existing nodejs packages that could be pulled (at least on for Fedora, one in EPEL only). Note, that not having the JS files for this Django plugin undermines the purpose of this package. It would be only as a lib if those JS are absent, as Django expects the static files within certain paths. Can anyone please advise? Thank you, and happy holidays! -Viliam [1] https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/python-djangoql/python3-djangoql/ [2] https://github.com/ivelum/djangoql-completion [3] https://www.npmjs.com/package/djangoql-completion [4] https://github.com/ivelum/djangoql/tree/740eaabfae1dfb6f099989d95a839145b... [5] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/JavaScript/#_co... [6] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling

2 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211223.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211221.0): ID: 1090992 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1090992 ID: 1091003 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1091003 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

2 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora-Cloud-35-20211223.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211222.0): ID: 1090976 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1090976 ID: 1090987 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1090987 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

2 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Review swap: python-colored-traceback

by W. Michael Petullo

I have proposed a python-colored-traceback package at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033730 Would anyone like to do a review swap? I am anxious to get python-colored-traceback reviewed, because the existing python-pwntools package will require python-colored-traceback with the release of 4.7.0. -- Mike :wq

2 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Non-responsive maintainer check for halfie

by Robby Callicotte

Hello, This is a non-responsive maintainer check for halfie. I have filed a bug for epel8/9 branch[1] and one for non-responsive maintainer[2]. Does anyone know how to contact halfie? [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030902 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035140 Regards, -- Robby Callicotte He/Him/His Timezone: America/Chicago IRC: c4t3l | Twitter: @robbycl2v

2 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora-IoT-35-20211222.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211212.1): ID: 1090534 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1090534 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211212.1): ID: 1090518 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1090518 Passed openQA tests: 15/16 (x86_64), 14/15 (aarch64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.28 to 0.15 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1085350#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1090525#downloads Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi: System load changed from 0.54 to 0.40 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1085360#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1090535#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

2 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora-Cloud-35-20211222.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211221.0): ID: 1090365 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1090365 ID: 1090376 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1090376 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

2 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Orphaning my NodeJS packages

by Ben Beasley

I am orphaning the following packages that contain a NodeJS “production” dependency bundle: - fkill-cli - fx (along with fx-completion, which depends on it) - nodejs-svgo - npm-name-cli - topojson-client - topojson-server - topojson-simplify Considering recent and ongoing discussion over the viability and proper application of the NodeJS packaging guidelines, I have concluded that it is not practical to maintain typical NodeJS utilities in an uncontroversial way.

2 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel December 2021