> >> > * python-3.x will not be in Fedora-11 unless it
becomes obvious in the
> >> > next few weeks that we absolutely must be running it for the next
release.
> >> > * we need more experience with python-2.6+ & python-3
compatibility
> >> > before we decide whether parallel versions of python are necessary.
> >> >
> >> > .. _[1]:
http://python-incompatibility.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/README.txt
> >> >
> >> > -Toshio
> >>
> >>
> >> Well again. Some people (like Toshio) seem to have a grasp on the
> >> matter. All this banter hasn't produced anything more of use. How
> >> about forming a temp SIG to take care of this trusting they do the
> >> right thing?
> >
> > As opposed to the Python SIG that already exists?
>
> No. Seems like the ideal body to come to a decision and let the rest
> of us know.
Well, most of the active members of the Python SIG have chimed in on
this, and we're all channeling Frankie.
Now, I do believe this is an important subject and we do need to gauge
the impact Python 3000 has on Fedora, but I believe that we are grossly
unequipped to do so at this time. I'd like to revisit this topic in
about a year (perhaps sooner, depending on circumstances), but for now
everyone just relax.
I would have thought we'd want to wait for a number of point releases
before putting it in anyway. Invariably there will be issues with a 0
release and you'd want to wait a couple of months for things to bed
down. With 2.6 being a release to allow easier migration to 3 I would
have thought its the perfect candidate for F-11 and by the time its
out there will be a much better picture of how we'd stand for v3.
Peter