I interpreted this to mean that, while this Java proposal and
Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval both have to do with i686 removals:
- the Java change should not be seen as part of Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
- the Java change was written without knowledge of Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
- the Java change should be considered separately from Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
- learning about Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval has not given the Java change owners any
reason to change or reconsider this proposal
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022, at 11:31 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 1:08 PM Jiri Vanek <jvanek(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Small clarification. I had jsut lerned abotu
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval . This java proposal
have nothig to do with that and was asctually done without anybody from JDK maintainers
beeing aware.
>> Still ti remains valid.
>
> What do you mean with "This java proposal have nothig to do with that
> and was asctually done without anybody from JDK maintainers beeing
> aware."? The JDK maintainers were not aware of this Java-related
> proposal? How can that be?
>
> Fabio
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure