Hi Gavin,
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Gavin Henry wrote:
for anyone that is interested I have made some rpms for the New Linux version of PuTTY (http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/)
I have hosted the rpms here:
http://www.suretecsystems.com/putty/md5sums http://www.suretecsystems.com/putty/putty-0.54-0.1.noarch.rpm http://www.suretecsystems.com/putty/putty.spec http://www.suretecsystems.com/putty/putty-0.54-0.1.src.rpm
I looked at your SPEC file and compared it what I had. I have the following differences:
+ What is the reason for choosing noarch ? + No desktop entry + No desktop icon + No manpages (there are 2 missing since the last release though) + You have a static version-less dependency for gtk+ + Don't use %makeinstall where possible
You can compare it with:
http://dag.wieers.com/packages/putty/putty.spec
Should I submit these to the Fedora QA team and update the specfile Fedora standards and to fdr extension?
For those interested for RHEL21, RH73, RH80, RH90, RHEL3 and RHFC1 at:
http://dag.wieers.com/packages/putty/
Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]